Displaying report 1-1 of 1.
Reports until 12:17, Sunday 20 September 2015
H1 CAL (CAL)
craig.cahillane@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:17, Sunday 20 September 2015 (21689)
Nominal ER8 Model vs. Systematic Correction ER8 Model Uncertainty
C. Cahillane

I have included systematic error in our Nominal ER8 Models.  From here on out I will call the ER8 Model with the systematic error corrections the Systematic Model.
The most notable thing about the Systematic Model is the extremely low level of uncertainty.  This is because I only include statistical uncertainty for the Systematic Model, and our coherence requirements for measurements is typically very high (0.99 or 0.98), making uncertainty low.

More analysis to come.
Plot 1 is the money plot.  It is the direct comparison of the uncertainty associated with the Nominal model (uncertainty which included systematics) and the Systematic model, which is only statistical uncertainty.  
Plot 2 is the Response function direct comparison for Nominal vs Systematic.
Plots 3-6 are the Nominal uncertainty components squared and their square roots 
Plots 7-10 are the Systematic version of the same thing.
Non-image files attached to this report
Displaying report 1-1 of 1.