Displaying report 1-1 of 1.
Reports until 14:48, Thursday 13 March 2014
H1 AOS
yuta.michimura@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:48, Thursday 13 March 2014 (10742)
PRMI noise budget model updated for balanced BS/PRM actuator

I updated Simulink noise budget model to incorporate balanced BS/PRM actuator.
Updates made since last alog (#10441) are;


PRMI sensing matrix I used is;
                PRCL    MICH
REFLAIR 45 I    4.8e5   1.5e4
REFLAIR 45 Q    3.9e3   -2.6e4  W/m


Some plots from NB model are attached. Data I used is taken from Mar 12, 12:43:00 UTC for 2048 seconds, when PRMI is sideband locked with REFLAIR45.

OLTF_MICH_1078663396.png: MICH OLTF. The magnitude from the model is higher than the measured by ~40 %. This means that there are some errors in the sensing matrix measurement. We have sensor/actuator calibration error of ~10%. Also, there was a power drop in the cavity build up (POP18) by ~10%. However, these errors don't explain the disagreement between the model and measurement. We need more investigaton on this. (There was is a suspision about the factor of sqrt(2) in BS, but I've checked that)

OLTF_PRCL_1078663396.png: PRCL OLTF. The model and measurement agrees within 10%. Also, phase looks reasonable (compare the OLTF before output matrix diagonalization in alog #10441; we had a dip).

PRCLtoMICH_1078663396.png, MICHtoPRCL_1078663396.png: Measured coupling between MICH loop and PRCL loop (TF from H1:LSC-MICH_EXC to H1:LSC-PRCL_IN1 or vice versa). Compared with the same measurement done before output matrix diagonalization, coupling is at least factor of 2 less (see alog #10481). Model explains some features qualitatively.

NB_MICH_1078663396.png, NB_PRCL_1078663396.png: Noise budget for MICH and PRCL loop. Note that seismic noise is not real (copied from LLO model).

Images attached to this report
Displaying report 1-1 of 1.