Displaying report 1-1 of 1.
Reports until 20:28, Tuesday 25 March 2014
H1 SUS
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:28, Tuesday 25 March 2014 - last comment - 08:41, Wednesday 26 March 2014(11002)
Undoing cable routing change for TMS (Corey, Jax, Keita)

When we went into the chamber we have found that the top cable rounting was done in such a way that

  1. Cables were loose and rubbing with each other,
  2. Cables were rubbing with the cable loops inside the top mass,
  3. One cable was touching the inside wall of the top mass hole from which the cables come out.

These are all bad, and I spent some time last week to divide four cables into two groups to make sure that none of the above was happening, but the cables were re-routed yesterday evening and they were bundled together without paying attention to the above.

Two of the four cables that go through the TMS top mass are for picomotors and are much thicker than BOSEM cables (the core diameter is bigger). These are stiff cables, and it's very difficult to route them such that they don't touch anything, and this is especially true for the pilot unit (TMSY) where the cable clamping inside the top mass is totally different from production units. How this is done has a big effect.

Attached are free swing spectra of three different cable routing. It's convenient to remember that there is a three-finger structure between 0.67 and 0.82 Hz.

Freeswing, this morning, ie cable rubbing (green).

Freeswing, after we made it the way we want it, no rubbing (blue).

We unbundled the cables, divided into three different routes (one route has two cables) and made sure that nothing is touching anything. This should be roughly the state of things from yesterday morning, except that the cables are divided into three instead of two (somehow it was very tough to do it right in just two routes today).

I believe that this is roughly the same state we were in during OAT days (https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=2587)

Freeswing, after we bundled cables together and used zip ties so that the cables at least don't rub against each other (red).

This is the state we're in now, as I wanted to see if zip ties help after we tested the blue configuration.

So, all in all, I think we need to go back to blue state tomorrow. Note that free swinging spectra are not transfer functions. This is a good tool to detect rubbing/interference.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 08:41, Wednesday 26 March 2014 (11006)

(Corey, Jax, Keita)

Additional notes to Keita's entry for Tues work.

Alignment Check In Morning

Started off the morning aligning the TMS with Jax after Arnaud/Travis' cable change on Mon night.  Saw a pitch change and needed to pitch the TMS "up" (which required me to move the "screw balance weight" from one end of the Table to the other, AND adding THREE more (see attached photo), in hindsight, I could have slid masses under the table).

Photos of Cable Set-ups

GREEN:  All four together from clamp to clamp

BLUE:  Two thick cables together & each thin cable separate

[alog doesn't like this set-up and doesn't let me upload a photo....yet] 
Since I can't upload any photos to the alog, here are links to BLUE photos in resourcespace:  overall, clamping at bottom

RED:  All four cables zip-tied together

We removed some Aluminum banding on a pair of cables running from the TMS table up to the Upper Mass.  This is where we currently are set up, but will move back to the blue set up.

[alog doesn't like this set-up and doesn't let me upload a photo....yet]

Here is an overall photo of cable.

Another Alignment Note:

During one of the Alignment checks, we needed to pitch down, so one of the screws which was added in the morning was removed (the Ag-plated one on the edge)...didn't take photo.

Images attached to this comment
Displaying report 1-1 of 1.