Stefan, Dan, Gabriele, Evan
Tonight we worked on making the ASC more robust, and the signals more decoupled.
We are able to close the same loops as last night (LHO#17124), with the same issues:
The goal for tonight was mainly to try fixing (1) and (2). For (2), Stefan worked on decoupling the POPA → PRM loop by applying a pitch step to PRC1, and then recording the resulting steps in the control signals of INP1, PRC1, PRC2, SRC1, and SRC2. These step sizes (normalized by the step in PRC1) are then put into the output matrix. This gave a noticeable decoupling of the loops.
For (1), we noticed that for every 0.1 µrad step in ETMX (pitch or yaw), PR2 required a step of 0.1 µrad in the same direction. Therefore, we are now experimenting with a new loop: REFLA9I + REFLB9I → ETMX + ETMY + 2×PR2. The factor of 2 was established empirically using the same method as above. The full cETM drive vector is −5.2 for PRM, 2.0 for PR2, 1 for ETMX, 1 for ETMY, −9.5 for SRM, 1.8 for SR2, and −0.15 for IM4, but we have not yet employed it successfully. It causes a very sudden unlock of the interferometer, whose cause we haven't pinned down yet.
Some notes about housekeeping:
PREP_TR_CARM
instead of CARM_ON_TR.