Displaying report 1-1 of 1.
Reports until 21:21, Wednesday 01 April 2015
H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:21, Wednesday 01 April 2015 - last comment - 08:48, Thursday 02 April 2015(17624)
ASL and tidal rearrangement

Sheila, Daniel, Kiwamu

Since we moved the ALS fiber AOM from a fixed frequency drive to the IMC VCO on saturday, we have had some annoying ALS locklosses.  This morning we thought through what we are using as a frequency reference now, and made some changes to the way that we lock and engage tidal. 

So the final configuration is that the Y arm is the reference, the X arm length follows the Y arm length, and the IMC follows the X arm.  This is working much better I think, we haven't had the frustrating locklosses this afternoon and evening. 

Comments related to this report
daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - 08:48, Thursday 02 April 2015 (17629)

For a historical perspective: Using the IMC VCO to drive the fiber AOM was our original configuration. During the HIFO tests we switched to a fixed frequency oscillator for the fiber AOM to de couple the arm locking from the IMC. As a consequence of the many improvements in the seismic isolation systems we became more sensitive to wind induced motions at very low frequencies. In turn this required more range in the VCOs used to lock the green light to the arm cavities. So much so that we frequently run out during elevated wind activity. Most of this motion turns out to be common. So, by locking the IMC to an arm cavity and by letting the fiber AOM follow the IMC we effectively reduce the required range for the end station VCOs. The IMC VCO has four times the range because the reference cavity AOM is double passed and because of the different wavelength. The penalty we pay is that the IMC now needs to be locked stably for enabling green arm cavity locking. However, during the current commissioning period and during observational runs this is not much of a disadvantage.

Displaying report 1-1 of 1.