Per JeffK's request, I have switched ETMX to the "windy" configuration. The ISI was already running the 90mhz blend since sometime this weekend. I've now also engaged the low frequency sensor correction on the X direction with the BRS turned on. I've been fiddling a little with the Z blend filters on St1, adding low pass filters to the 90mhz Z blend, but it doesn't seem to affect the St2 performance much. I'll post more on that in a bit.
Our goal is to prove that not only can this X DOF "windy" configuration (90 mHz blend, broadband, low-frequency sensor correction, with the BRS) replicate the performance of ISI in its "nominal" X DOF configuration (45 mHz blend, narrow-band 0.43 [Hz] sensor correction, no BRS), but it can do *better* than the nominal configuration during high winds. As such, we want to compare three different configurations: (1) Nominal ("45 mHz blend, derosa 0.43 Hz only sensor correction, no BRS") [we should already have plenty of this data] (2) Windy when BRS doesn't work ("90 mHz blend, derosa 0.43 Hz only sensor correction, no BRS") [we may already have plenty of this data] (3) Windy with a functional BRS ("90 mHz blend, mittleman broadband low-frequency sensor correction, BRS on") [what we'll get now, hopefully if the winds pick back up] We've got some more of configuration (2) this morning, 2015-04-06 16:00 UTC to 17:00 UTC -- winds were max ~25 [mph] so that will be great fodder to compare what Jim's put the ETM ISI into now ( configuration (3) ). And for the record, it was switched into this configuration (3) at 2015-04-06 21:10 UTC. Now we just need the winds to pick up again...