Evan, Sheila
We have been able to lock the IFO at 10 Watts with a recycling gain of 37. We also think that we can probably improve our inital alingment scheme by adding a servo from POP A to PR3 durring the INput align step. We've closed loops around ITMX from the TRX QPDs, these were stable for almost an hour before we dropped the lock for other reasons, and helped keep the X arm build up stable as we increased the power.
Variation on Inital Alingment
At the beginning of the evening, our alignment resulted in a rather low recycling gain (15 or something) which resulted in difficulty locking. This was probably because the ITM camera references would have moved 18033. We have now gone through an initial alignment with some extra steps which brought us back to a decent recycling gain (35 before any manual adjustment or full lock ASC).
PIT (urad) | Yaw | |
PD1 | 169.2 | -311.4 |
PD4 | 134.5 | -278.9 |
mean | 151.85 | -295.15 |
This resulted in a recycling gain of about 35, so it seems like this was a sucsesful approach at least once. If there is time for some day time commissioning tomorrow, it would probably be helpful to add to the INPUT align state a loop which actuates on PR3 to center the beam on POP A. Commissioning the dither Align script for the BS to ETMY baffle PDs might also be helpful, but this is a lower priority because we aren't sure that step is necessary.
Since we have seen this week that many things (CARM offset reduction, violin and roll mode damping, and ASC error signals, possible radiation pressure instability on the ITMs) change when we go from a bad recycling gain to a good one, it seems like we will want to improve our initial alignment scheme enough to consistently bring us to a high enough recycling gain that we can use consistent settings for lock acquisition.
Avoiding oscillations durring power up
We ran into the oscillation in ITM pitch which we think is due to mis centering and radiation pressure on the ITMs several times tonight. It seems like we are more stable when the recycling gain is high, we have also slowed down the final CARM offset reduction and the power increase.
Closing ITM loops
We were able to close loops around ITMX from the QPD error signals we found last night. Here are settings:
DSOFT P (ITMX P) error signal 1.71 TRX A -1 TRX B FM offset 0.08, FM2,3,4 gain -700,000, top mass offloading on
DSOFT Y (ITMX Y) error signal 1.84 TRX A -1 TRX B FM offset -0.1, FM2,3,4,6 gain 600,000, top mass offloading on
both of these loops respond in a 2-3 seconds.
DARM OLG
Evan made a measurement of the DARM OLG, this was when we still on ETMX, DC readout with low frequency boost, and a recycling gain of 35. 11 Watts input power.
Now a large earthquake has tripped most of the seismic platforms.
While in full RF lock with a good recycling gain, turn off the green QPD servo and align the Y green beam to the arm manually (or using green WFS feeding back to PZT mirrors), then and set the QPD offsets.
Hopefully this will fix the ETMY green beam position, and makes Y arm initial alignment less convoluted.
The BS alignment slider values for PD1 and PD4 are switched in this entry. I redid the BS→EY baffle pointing today and found
P (µrad) | Y (µrad) | |
PD1 | 134.3 | −280.0 |
PD4 | 169.5 | −314.0 |
Mean | 151.9 | −297.0 |
Also, PD4 has a large dark offset (19.7 µW) compared to PD1 (−0.5 µW). The net power reported by PD4 with the PSL beam pointing onto it is 4.2 µW, and the for PD1 it is 5.2 µW. The settings for both are 0 dB gain, 0.5 A/W responsivity, and 20 kΩ transimpedance.