Displaying report 1-1 of 1.
Reports until 05:25, Monday 09 February 2015
H1 ISC
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - posted 05:25, Monday 09 February 2015 - last comment - 14:50, Wednesday 27 May 2015(16569)
1 hour lock on analog CARM, 4 kHz bandwidth

Sheila, Alexa, Evan

Summary

We have transitoned CARM from digital normalized REFLAIR9I to analog REFLAIR9I, with a 4 kHz bandwidth and 50 degrees of phase. An OLTF is attached [the last data point is spurious, so ignore it]. This lock started at about 2015-02-09 12:24:00 UTC. We are leaving the IFO locked.

There is plenty of phase to push the bandwidth higher, but we have encountered large offsets induced by switching on the common-mode and summing-node boards.

We can also improve the low-frequency fluctuations of the CARM error signal by introducing an integrator somewhere; we need more dc gain.

Details

Analog REFLAIR9I is plugged into input B2 on the summing-node board (SNB), with polarity "off". The output of B goes into input #2 on the common-mode board (CMB), with positive polarity. Digital normalized REFLAIR9I is plugged into input A1 on the SNB, with polarity "on". The output of A goes to input #1 on the CMB. [See LHO#16489 for a review.]

According to our reckoning, the shape of the digital CARM loop at the start of the transition is roughly 1/f above a few hertz. At a few hertz and below, it has a number of boosts and integrators which make it tricky to engineer a stable crossover with the analog signal.

Transition procedure is as follows, starting right after the guardian has brought the interferometer into resonance.

Also, the use of DHARD WFS (pitch and yaw) has removed the need for touching up the ETMs. However, since the AS36Q WFS feedback to the BS has not worked for the past couple of days, the BS had to be touched up by hand every so often.

Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
peter.fritschel@LIGO.ORG - 09:25, Monday 09 February 2015 (16572)

In fact this lock lasted about 2.5 hours.

result image

lisa.barsotti@LIGO.ORG - 11:55, Monday 09 February 2015 (16574)ISC
The lock broke due to a ~ 5kHz oscillation in the CARM loop (first plot).

The second plots shows several locking attempts from last night. The drop in the sideband power observed during  the first long lock last Friday , correlated with the increase of the carrier build-up during acuqisition, is not present anymore now that the locking sequence is much faster, so it might have been some thermal-induced effect.

The third plot shows the trend of the power recycling sideband and carrier power, whose fluctuations are well correlated with angular PIT motion of the BS (ASC BS loops not yet closed, as Evan was saying).

Images attached to this comment
Non-image files attached to this comment
eleanor.king@LIGO.ORG - 13:38, Monday 09 February 2015 (16579)

Here are some numbers for arm buildup on resonance, recycling gain and stored arm power for last night's lock:

-IMC input power was 2.81W.  Given modulation depths of Γ9 = 0.219(12) and Γ45 = 0.277(16), from alog 15674, the power in the sidebands is (Γ92452)/2=6%, there was 2.64W carrier power into IMC.  88% of this power is transmitted through the PSL-IMC-Faraday chain to PRM as measured in alog 13495.

-Arm buildup (X-arm) was 1200 x single arm power (1210 at the beginning of the lock).   LSC-TR_X_QPD_B_SUM_OUTPUT was an average of 1035(10) cts during the lock stretch.  This QPD is already roughly calibrated to arm buildup, but can be corrected for new input power levels as per Evan's alog 16450, so [arm buildup]=TR_X_QPD_B_SUM_OUTPUT*(10.95/2.82)*(3/10).

-Recycling gain was 36 W/W.  [Recycling gain]=[arm buildup]/[PRM transmissivity], assuming PRM transmissisivty of 2.97% from galaxy page.

-X-arm cavity gain is 276 W/W.  G_arm=( ti / (1-ri*re) ) ^2. Transmissivities Ti=1.39% and Te=3.6ppm according to galaxy webpage.  re=sqrt(1-Te-Le)  where Le is the x-arm loss is assumed to be 120(30)ppm based on alogs 16082, 15937, 15919.

-Power stored in the X-arm was 11.5kW. P_arm=[carrier power into PRC]*[recycling gain]*[0.5 (beamsplitter)]*[arm cavity gain]=2.64*0.88*36*0.5*276.

eleanor.king@LIGO.ORG - 14:50, Wednesday 27 May 2015 (18653)

I made a typo in the equation for recycling gain, which should read:    [Recycling gain]=[arm buildup]*[PRM transmissivity]

Displaying report 1-1 of 1.