Displaying report 1-1 of 1.
Reports until 16:35, Friday 31 July 2015
H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:35, Friday 31 July 2015 - last comment - 18:23, Friday 31 July 2015(20113)
channels which differ between the two sites' science frames

attached is a file listing the channel differences between the L1 and H1 science frames.

Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 18:23, Friday 31 July 2015 (20121)DAQ, ISC, SEI, SUS, SYS
It looks like almost all of the non-PEM differences can be explained by differences in hardware, control scheme/choices, and non-deprecated channels due to little-to-no maintenance. 

LHO has a beam rotation sensor, and LLO does not.
< H1:ISI-GND_BRS_ETMX_REF_OUT_DQ 256
< H1:ISI-GND_BRS_ETMX_RY_OUT_DQ 256

LHO uses a different tidal scheme (T1400733).
< H1:LSC-Y_ARM_OUT_DQ 256
< H1:LSC-Y_TIDAL_OUT_DQ 256

LHO has not yet updated the CAL-CS calibration for IMC-F, so it remains in OAF.
< H1:OAF-CAL_IMC_F_DQ 16384

LLO has PI damping and LLO does not?
> L1:LSC-X_EXTRA_AI_1_OUT_DQ 2048
> L1:LSC-X_EXTRA_AI_2_OUT_DQ 2048
> L1:LSC-X_EXTRA_AI_3_OUT_DQ 2048
> L1:LSC-Y_EXTRA_AI_1_OUT_DQ 2048
> L1:LSC-Y_EXTRA_AI_2_OUT_DQ 2048
> L1:LSC-Y_EXTRA_AI_3_OUT_DQ 2048

Regardless of what was decided via the formal process, Daniel hasn't visited LLO recently and force-reduced the ODC data rate.
< H1:ODC-X_CHANNEL_OUT_DQ 16384
< H1:ODC-Y_CHANNEL_OUT_DQ 16384
< H1:PSL-ODC_CHANNEL_OUT_DQ 16384
---
> L1:ODC-X_CHANNEL_OUT_DQ 32768
> L1:ODC-Y_CHANNEL_OUT_DQ 32768
> L1:PSL-ODC_CHANNEL_OUT_DQ 32768

LLO has not completely deprecated OAF for all of its LSC DOF calibrations.
> L1:OAF-CAL_CARM_X_DQ 16384
> L1:OAF-CAL_DARM_DQ 16384
> L1:OAF-CAL_MICH_DQ 16384
> L1:OAF-CAL_PRCL_DQ 16384
> L1:OAF-CAL_SRCL_DQ 16384
> L1:OAF-CAL_XARM_DQ 16384
> L1:OAF-CAL_YARM_DQ 16384

LLO uses a different ISS second loop scheme (or hasn't deprecated one of its attempts that is no longer used)?
> L1:PSL-ISS_SECONDLOOP_PD_14_SUM_OUT_DQ 16384
> L1:PSL-ISS_SECONDLOOP_PD_58_SUM_OUT_DQ 16384

LLO has a HV ESD driver on its ITMX, LHO does not.
> L1:SUS-ITMX_L3_ESDAMON_DC_DQ 256
> L1:SUS-ITMX_L3_ESDAMON_LL_DQ 256
> L1:SUS-ITMX_L3_ESDAMON_LR_DQ 256
> L1:SUS-ITMX_L3_ESDAMON_UL_DQ 256
> L1:SUS-ITMX_L3_ESDAMON_UR_DQ 256
> L1:SUS-ITMX_L3_ESDDMON_CAS_DQ 256
> L1:SUS-ITMX_L3_ESDDMON_HVN_DQ 256
> L1:SUS-ITMX_L3_ESDDMON_HVP_DQ 256
> L1:SUS-ITMX_L3_ESDDMON_LVN_DQ 256
> L1:SUS-ITMX_L3_ESDDMON_LVP_DQ 256
> L1:SUS-ITMX_L3_ESDDMON_MCU_DQ 256
> L1:SUS-ITMX_L3_ESDDMON_TM1_DQ 256
> L1:SUS-ITMX_L3_ESDDMON_TM2_DQ 256
> L1:SUS-ITMX_L3_ESDDMON_TM3_DQ 256
> L1:SUS-ITMX_L3_ESDDMON_TM4_DQ 256
> L1:SUS-ITMX_L3_ESDDMON_TM5_DQ 256
> L1:SUS-ITMX_L3_ESDDMON_TM6_DQ 256
Displaying report 1-1 of 1.