christopher.biwer@LIGO.ORG - posted 23:53, Friday 25 September 2015 - last comment - 07:38, Monday 28 September 2015(21965)
Hardware injection testing for lower frequency waveforms
We tested a set of waveforms to see if they would saturation the ETMY ESD. Test the 15Hz waveform Previously we have tested a waveform that began at 30Hz, see aLog 21838. It was requested we try it from 15Hz instead of 30Hz. Here are the commands I ran for testing the 15Hz waveform: ezcawrite H1:CAL-INJ_TINJ_TYPE 1 awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/coherenttest1from15hz_1126257408.out 0.1 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/coherenttest1from15hz_1126257408.out 0.25 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/coherenttest1from15hz_1126257408.out 0.5 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/coherenttest1from15hz_1126257408.out 1.0 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/coherenttest1from15hz_1126257408.out 1.0 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/coherenttest1from15hz_1126257408.out 1.0 -d -d >> log3.txt The start times of the injections from the log file (log3.txt): SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127276638, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127276799, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127277026, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127277293, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127277517, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127277840, epoch=0, sample=0 I did not notice any ESD saturations. John's waveforms John V. has also provided 10 waveforms that I tested, see aLog 21964. Cautiously testing the first waveform Here are the command I entered as I slowly scaled up the first waveform's amplitude: awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior0_1126259455.out 0.2 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior0_1126259455.out 0.3333 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior0_1126259455.out 0.5 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior0_1126259455.out 0.6666 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior0_1126259455.out 0.75 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior0_1126259455.out 0.85 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior0_1126259455.out 1.0 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior0_1126259455.out 1.0 -d -d >> log3.txt The start times for these injections: SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127278105, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127278209, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127278748, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127279093, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127279520, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127279644, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127280123, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127280433, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127281232, epoch=0, sample=0 The injection that began at 1127280433 was near an ETMY alert from the robot voice. The ETMY alert happened a bit after the injection happened. SO I waited, I repeated the same injection, and there was no alert. I did one of these injections with a padding of 10 minutes so if the search groups are going to followup one of these injections in more detail this would be a good choice: awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior0_1126259455.out 1.0 -d -d >> log3.txt # gave this guy a bit of time The start time of this injection is: SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127281956, epoch=0, sample=0 Testing the other nine waveforms Then I tested the remaining 9 waveforms by beginning with a scale factor of 0.3333 and incrementing to 1.0. I did these with little spacing between the injections so I do not think this set is worth the analysis groups following up. However, I think the injections with scale factor 1.0 should be looked at for ESD saturation (I believe Andy has a script for that): awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior1_1126259455.out 0.3333 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior1_1126259455.out 0.6666 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior1_1126259455.out 1.0 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior2_1126259455.out 0.3333 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior2_1126259455.out 0.6666 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior2_1126259455.out 1.0 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior3_1126259455.out 0.3333 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior3_1126259455.out 0.6666 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior3_1126259455.out 1.0 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior4_1126259455.out 0.3333 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior4_1126259455.out 0.6666 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior4_1126259455.out 1.0 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior5_1126259455.out 0.3333 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior5_1126259455.out 0.6666 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior5_1126259455.out 1.0 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior6_1126259455.out 0.3333 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior6_1126259455.out 0.6666 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior6_1126259455.out 1.0 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior7_1126259455.out 0.3333 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior7_1126259455.out 0.6666 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior7_1126259455.out 1.0 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior8_1126259455.out 0.3333 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior8_1126259455.out 0.6666 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior8_1126259455.out 1.0 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior9_1126259455.out 0.3333 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior9_1126259455.out 0.6666 -d -d >> log3.txt awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 ../H1/posterior9_1126259455.out 1.0 -d -d >> log3.txt The start times of these injections: SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127282013, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127282066, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127282120, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127282173, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127282226, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127282278, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127282326, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127282377, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127282422, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127282476, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127282517, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127282577, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127282631, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127282681, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127282727, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127282770, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127282819, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127282964, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127283007, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127283048, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127283089, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127283160, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127283204, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127283245, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127283292, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127283338, epoch=0, sample=0 SIStrOpen: Waveform starts at GPS=1127283440, epoch=0, sample=0 As I did these injections I had the SUS-ETMY_L3_ESDOUTF_LL_OUT channel open in dataviewer. I did not see any injection go above the 90000 counts. The highest was posterior0*.out which was near 80000 counts.
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
I am going to follow up the injections I passed to Chris. Assuming the "start time" is the time at the 1st sample of the injection file (and not the 1st non-zero sample) the end times of the increasing amplitude posterior0 injections should be around
[1127278112.46, 1127278216.46, 1127278755.46, 1127279100.46, 1127279527.46, 1127279651.46, 1127280130.46, 1127280440.46, 1127281239.46, 1127281963.46]
and for the scan through posterior injections 1-9 with increasing amplitude they are
[1127282020.46, 1127282073.46, 1127282127.46, 1127282180.46, 1127282233.46, 1127282285.46, 1127282333.46, 1127282384.46, 1127282429.46, 1127282483.46, 1127282524.46, 1127282584.46, 1127282638.46, 1127282688.46, 1127282734.46, 1127282777.46, 1127282826.46, 1127282971.46, 1127283014.46, 1127283055.46, 1127283096.46, 1127283167.46, 1127283211.46, 1127283252.46, 1127283299.46, 1127283345.46, 1127283447.46]
I'm going to just run all of these since they should be quite cheap to do. I'll post an update when the runs complete.
The only ETMY overflows during the injection periods were: 1127278436.8 1127280154.9 (also overflowed ETMY L2 and OMC DCPD) 1127282847.5 None were related to the injections.