Reports until 16:23, Wednesday 11 November 2015
H1 CAL (CAL)
darkhan.tuyenbayev@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:23, Wednesday 11 November 2015 (23321)
DARMOLGTF measurement vs. model comparison

This is a belated report on comparing DARMOLGTF and PCAL2DARMTF measurements taken on Oct 28, 2015 (LHO alog 22928) vs. DARM model.

The comparison showed that measured sensing function residual have reduced to under 1% in a band [~30 ~500] Hz when comparing to a κtst and κC corrected DARM model. Also κpu is close to unity and cc pole frequency calculated from cal lines just before we started taking the TF measurements is 10 Hz higher than the one around October 15 TF measurements, and closer to 341 Hz, a value in the canonical DARM model. For previous kappa values see reports from previous similar analysis: LHO alog 22571, LHO alog 22552, LHO alog 22071.

Kappas used in the kappa corrected parameter file H1DARMparams_1130094627_kappa_corr are given below (notice that at this point we only apply κtst and κC). These are 60 minute mean kappas calculated from 60 s FFT SLM data starting at GPS 1130091000.

κtst = 1.012713
κpu = 1.003557
κA = 1.015523
κC = 0.980036
fc = 344.154643 [Hz]

An updated comparison script and parameter files for the most recent measurements were committed to calibration SVN (r1759):

/trunk/Runs/O1/H1/Scripts/DARMOLGTFs/H1DARMparams_1130094627.m (r1751)
/trunk/Runs/O1/H1/Scripts/DARMOLGTFs/
H1DARMparams_1130094627_kappa_corr.m
/trunk/Runs/O1/H1/Scripts/DARMOLGTFs/CompareDARMOLGTFs_O1.m
/trunk/Runs/O1/H1/Scripts/CAL_PARAM/plotCalparameterFromSLMData.m

Comparison plots were committed to CalSVN (r1779):

/trunk/Runs/O1/H1/Results/DARMOLGTFs/2015-10-28_H1DARM_O1_cmp_*.pdf

Non-image files attached to this report