Displaying report 1-1 of 1.
Reports until 02:57, Tuesday 08 March 2016
H1 General
lisa.barsotti@LIGO.ORG - posted 02:57, Tuesday 08 March 2016 - last comment - 14:53, Tuesday 08 March 2016(25929)
Quick summary of today's work
Sheila, Jenne, Matt, Rob, Evan, Lisa

Several things happened today, more details will be posted later:
  • we locked several times in low noise (note: ASC in the old configuration with DC (not RF90MHz) centering, see week-end entries for more details): the best range we saw today was about ~70 Mpc, due to some peaks in the spectrum higher than usual -- the 290 Hz was particularly higher than during O1;
  • in low noise Sheila made several ISI shaking tests, Robert did some investigations in parallel as well;
  • we looked at the coupling into the OMC at full power: this measurement needs to be repeated to make sure the conclusion we get is right, as the inferred coupling to the OMC would be significantly lower than what assumed from previous measurements;
  • Jenne took some DHARD open loop transfer functions as function of the DARM offset;
  • some off-line investigations to get hints of the mystery noise happened as well, more details will follow.
Some of these things are not finished as an earthquake hit us around 10pm local time; we waited for two hours for the noise to go down again, but we couldn't really relock robustly afterwards, even when the ground motion seemed back to normal (to be investigated). Some items for our to-do-list that came up tonight (to be merged with what we already have on the control room whiteboard) are:
  • inspired by Kiwamu's analysis, modulate the vertical position of optics and look for changes in the DARM noise;
  • (new entry): look at the DARM rms, and see if there is some loop optimization that can be done to minimize it (in particular, check if rms optimization advocated by Jeff at the last commissioning workshop happened or not);
  • in-depth analysis of frequency noise, in particular look for saturations in the common mode board;
  • close the loop on this OMC coupling, and if it is real, distinguish between mode mismatch vs misalignment - if it turns out that the alignment into the OMC is bad, resurrect deacon alignment (ECR already submitted and approved).
Comments related to this report
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 14:53, Tuesday 08 March 2016 (25935)

Higher-than-before jitter coupling seems to have made a lot of excess noise peaks. See these high coherence peaks between DARM and various IMC WFS signals (only WFS DC signals are shown).

It doesn't look like the intensity noise caused by the jitter (look at low coherence between DARM and ISS second loop signal, also IM4_TRANS_SUM coherence is low even when IM4_TRANS_PIT coherence is high).

Something seems to be excited on the PSL table (look at the coherence between DARM and PSL table accelerometer).

What happened in the PSL since Feb 26 2016 16:30 UTC when the IFO was in good low noise lock?

Images attached to this comment
Displaying report 1-1 of 1.