Displaying report 1-1 of 1.
Reports until 03:37, Thursday 16 June 2016
H1 ISC
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - posted 03:37, Thursday 16 June 2016 - last comment - 03:37, Thursday 16 June 2016(27769)
SRC ASC work

Evan, Sheila, Stefan

For now we decided that we need to go back to a SRC alignment scheme similar to the O1 one - while not great it kept the machine running with the existing hardware. And we know that was at least reliable enough to do other work.

We started with SRC1_Y. The combination
        ezca['ASC-INMATRIX_Y_6_3']=-1.5   # AS_A36I to SRC1_Y
        ezca['ASC-INMATRIX_Y_6_7']=1      # AS_B36I to SRC1_Y
gave a reasonable error signal with about zero offset, and we could close the loop - with a gain of -30 for now.

As in the past pitch is a bit more tricky. AS_B36I has a nice signal but also quite the offset. We lost lock before finding a good value for this, and had an episode of lock losses most likely due to bad initial alignment. (below).
On the next round the following gains seemed to work for now:

       #set input matrix
        ezca['ASC-INMATRIX_P_6_3']=0 # off for now
        ezca['ASC-INMATRIX_P_6_7']=1 # good enough for now
        ezca['ASC-INMATRIX_Y_6_3']=-1.5
        ezca['ASC-INMATRIX_Y_6_7']=1
        ezca['ASC-INMATRIX_P_6_1']=0
        ezca['ASC-INMATRIX_P_6_5']=0
        ezca['ASC-INMATRIX_Y_6_1']=0
        ezca['ASC-INMATRIX_Y_6_5']=0

 

 

As mentioned, in the meantime we had a number of most likely initial alignment related locklosses. They first occured in the CARM ASC engagement, and later even DRMI phase..

I did a full  initial alignment, and also noticed that the QPD offsets on the red X TR photodiode offset was unreasonably high. I re-zeroed this offset.

 

With that the IFO saw a two Watts, DC readout for 2+h.

Next on the menu was more violin damping. I focused on EX, which currently has 3 moned intermingling; 505.587Hz, 505.707Hz and 505.710Hz.

505.587Hz: Damps with H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_DAMP_MODE1, FM1, FM4, gain=100.

The other two are simply too close to each other (beat signal of 5min!) - we need to damp with the same filter.. I focused on 505.710Hz., which is the big peak.
 I deleted the narrow bandstop filters, and significantly widened the band-pass filter FM1, and tried with

505.710Hz    H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_DAMP_MODE6, FM1, FM4, gain=200.

which seems to work.

The next mode (which actually grew while I paid attention to the other 3) is 507.194Hz, together with 507.159Hz.

507.159Hz seems to damp with H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_DAMP_MODE6 FM1 FM3 FM4, gain=50 (later gain=10). But currently 507.194Hz still bleeds through this filter, which makes it hard to damp.

I left 507.194Hz in H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_DAMP_MODE7 FM1, FM4 gain=50, which seems to provide a wee bit of damping.

After that, ITMY also needs more attention.

 

I leave the interferometer running at 2Watts - I would recommend focusing on getting the violins under control - they prevent other work.

 

 

Comments related to this report
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - 03:37, Thursday 16 June 2016 (27770)



Also, we noted that the large DC offsets in the AS_B_RF36_I singals can be removed by adding DC pointing offsets - another hint that all this SRC mess is related a centeriong problem.
The offsets were
H1:ASC-DC4_P_OFFSET -0.13
H1:ASC-DC4_Y_OFFSET  0.33

Displaying report 1-1 of 1.