Displaying report 1-1 of 1.
Reports until 13:34, Wednesday 29 June 2016
H1 SEI (ISC, OpsInfo)
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:34, Wednesday 29 June 2016 - last comment - 14:03, Wednesday 29 June 2016(28050)
Maintaining lock during earthquakes

Last night at about 23:30 UTC last night, we had an earthquake arrive at LHO. I don't know where it was or how big, because Terramon has been down for a while. The peak BLRMS displacement seen by the ITMY STS in the .03-.1hz region was .28 microns. The first thing I noticed was the IMC F and LSC Y TIDAL on the Tidal StripTool were showing large ~20 second oscillations. When Sheila switched to  the "Earthquake" SEI_CONF state, these oscilations went away, even though the earthquake band ground motion continued going up. My first plot shows the SEI_CONF state ( 40 is the windy state (SC on everywhere), 17 is the earthquake state) ITMY Z .03-.1hz BLRMS displacement in nm, IMC-F and LSC-Y_TIDAL_MON. You can see that at about the time the ground motion BLRMS gets to about 100nm, the IMC and LSC TIdal starts ringing up. As soon as the sensor correction is turned off, the IMC and Tidal settle down. This lock lasted in this configuration past the earthquake, until the commissioners tried to move to a higher guardian state.

The next two images are two times later in the evening, one when the SEI_CONF was still in the earthquake mode (6/29/2016 1:10 UTC), the other after the later lockloss when the commissioners had changed back to the "Windy" SEI_CONF state (6/29/2016 2:13 UTC). IMC and Tidal don't seem to be bothered by either state. The newt four images are various spectra comparing IFO control signals at these two times. Unfortunately it looks like there was maybe another small earthquake and higher winds when the SEI_CONF was still in "earthquake". All "REF" traces are with the earthquake configuration, the live traces are with the windy configuration. I think these spectra show that for now we can be in either state, but some of the suspension length signals show lower drives with the "windy" config. Additionally, the earthquake config will probably not be okay with higher microseism, we have been sitting at about 10th percentile levels for a while now. The last plot just shows the effect of turning of the (BRS subtracted, STS based) sensor correction on the ETMY ST1 T240s. The Y blend is the same for both blue and pink traces. The subtraction at the microseism doesn't look good right now, but I think that is because of the low microseism.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
sebastien.biscans@LIGO.ORG - 14:03, Wednesday 29 June 2016 (28060)

Hey Jim, great post, I'm happy to see there is already a SEI_CONF in place for EQ.

About the epics variable for EQ, we implemented one here at MIT that seems to work fine (more details here). Right now it just does what terramon is doing (arrival time and predicted amplitude), which is a start but not perfect. The goal would be to have a real warning system, telling us how likely we are to loose lock. We are curently working on that, and hopefully we could install something at the sites soon.

Displaying report 1-1 of 1.