Patrick, Sheila, Carl and Ross damping PIs
After Keita's ISS fixes we had a few hours of bad weather and earthquakes that contributed to dificulty locking. Once things calmed down we locked and sat at several stages to see if the lock was stable, DC readout, 25 Watts, ISS 2nd loop engaged, and now we have made it to some kind of "nominal low noise" state. Patrick hit the intent bit.
There are several things wrong with this spectrum, some of which could be solved by going back to 40 Watts in the morning:
The last attached screenshot is just to show how many locking attempts everyone made in the last 14 hours. The range displayed by the DMT viewer in the control room seems to have a problem, it should be stable at some low range but on the DMT viewer it looks like we lost lock in the last half hour.
Sheila's comment
There were several things which had to be done today because of the change to run ER9 at 25 Watts.
We should remember to undo these things as soon as we go back to 40 Watts. According to Ross and Carl, there isn't a reason to think our PI situation has gotten worse than it was for the last 2 weeks where we had stable locks more than 4 hours long, but the PI damping would need to be babysat at 40 Watts. Maybe an engineering run is a good time for detector engineers and operators to learn how to do this.
There are several things that should be done if we want to continue the ER at 25 Watts with a reasonable sensitivity:
none of these are all that hard to do, but to me it seems like it would be more productive to try continuing the ER at 40 Watts, to see what we can learn about the IFO in a state that is more similar to the configuration we would like to run at for O2.
DARM-ISS 2nd loop coherence doesn't change by increasing the ISS 2nd loop gain by 6dB. Jitter or whatever, ISS is imprinting noise onto intensity.
Keita, this is something I think we saw in the past too:
https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=20394
CO2 related comment: