Reports until 16:30, Wednesday 20 July 2016
H1 SEI (ISC)
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:30, Wednesday 20 July 2016 - last comment - 11:37, Friday 22 July 2016(28536)
Large BSC-ISI ST1 actuator drives cause suspension alignment drifts

Hugh, JeffK, JimW

Short version:

 

I noticed this afternoon that all of the BSC-ISIs were pushing large DC-ish drives on their St1 vertical actuators (generally about 2000 counts, normal drives are ~100). When I trended the BS and ITMX drives against their Sus oplevs, there seems to be a very clear correlation between large ISI drives and oplev yaw. I think this may be the cause of the drifts that Sheila complained about yesterday. The first attached plot shows the BS 3 vertical drives and BS oplev yaw, second is for the same for ITMX.

One possible cause of this is the actuators heating up the ISI. During the timing kerfluffle yesterday, all of the ISIs sat for ~6 hours with no acuator drive. The control room then recovered all of the platforms and proceeded to start aligning the interferometer, so the ISIs went from a "cold", immediately to an aligned state. Arnaud found a similar effect at LLO,  where large ISI tidal drives caused angular drift during locks, when LLO tried offloading tidal to the ISI ( https://alog.ligo-la.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=20222 ).

In the future we should try to at least get the ISIs damped as soon as possible after similar maintenance, or go through a cycle of de-isolating/re-isolating after the ISIs have been running for a while, before trying to relock the IFO. The morning of Jul 11th, ITMX was down for almost 14hrs, but the damping loops were still on, and the actuators were still getting a drive signal. When the ISI was re-isolated, the oplev didn't see any appreciable drift over the next several hours (see third plot). Similarly, sometime before the commissioners start locking tomorrow, all the BSCs should be taken down to damped and then re-isolated.

We also considered that something in the timing system could have been responsible, but were unable to find anything to support that. None of the timing signals we looked at showed anything like the drift we saw in the ISIs. We also saw a similar alignment drift after the June power outage, that would seem to support a thermal drift over a some timing shenanigans.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
richard.mittleman@LIGO.ORG - 06:34, Thursday 21 July 2016 (28548)

I can think of  two fixes for this,

                             1) we could have a new "off" state where the actuators have a DC value that  represents the offset that they were at in the running state

                           2) we measure the temperature of the the stages (Quad top mass vertical position for stage two, possibly stage one vertical force for stage one) and feed forward to the yaw control

jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - 11:37, Friday 22 July 2016 (28585)

Arnaud's comment in case we come across this problem again: turn off the RZ loops. The drift is caused (we think) by thermal expansion of the stage, this changes the free hanging position of the ISI and the drift that the interferometer sees is likely dominated by RZ. If we turn the loop off, the stage will stay in a neutral position, rather than following a spurious thermally driven alignment.