Displaying report 1-1 of 1.
Reports until 14:55, Thursday 06 October 2016
H1 DetChar (DetChar)
gabriele.vajente@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:55, Thursday 06 October 2016 - last comment - 16:41, Thursday 06 October 2016(30273)
Coherences

I ran a BruCo scan for the last night lock, using ten minutes of data when the range was at ~65 MPc. Results are available here:

https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~gabriele.vajente/bruco_1159774937/

Summary

There is a lot of coherence a bit everywhere:

The "jitter noise" above 100 Hz shows a lot of coherence with many signals, of different origins. Most of the IMC WFS signals are coherent, for example: IMC-WFS_A/B_DC_PIT/YAW_OUT (fig. 5 and 6).

The most interesting coherence is however with the intensity stabilization: PSL-ISS_PDA_REL_OUT and PSL-ISS_PDB_REL_OUT shows quite large coherence, as well as the ISS control signal: PSL-ISS_AOM_DRIVER_MON_OUT. It seems that PDA and PDB (first loop ISS) are completely dominated by what the ISS second loop is doing (as shown by the control signal). The coherence with DARM in the 100-1000 Hz region is very close to one. See fig. 7 and 8.

Note that in the same 100-1000 Hz region, the coherence with PSL lab accelerometers is also significant, but mostly on the peaks (fig. 9)

En passant, a narrow feature at 56.75 Hz and 113.50 Hz are coherent with EX magnetometers (PEM-EX_MAG_EBAY_SEIRACK_X/Y PEM-EX_MAG_VEA_FLOOR_Y/Z)

Multicoherence

I selected the channels with the largest coherence from the BruCo report, and run a multicoherence code.

chnames = {'H1:LSC-MICH_OUT_DQ', 'H1:LSC-SRCL_OUT_DQ', 'H1:LSC-PRCL_OUT_DQ', ...
            'H1:ASC-AS_B_RF45_Q_YAW_OUT_DQ', 'H1:ASC-OMC_B_YAW_OUT_DQ', 'H1:ASC-OMC_B_PIT_OUT_DQ', ...
            'H1:LSC-REFL_A_RF45_I_ERR_DQ', 'H1:LSC-REFL_A_RF9_Q_ERR_DQ', 'H1:IMC-WFS_A_DC_PIT_OUT_DQ', ...
            'H1:IMC-WFS_B_DC_PIT_OUT_DQ', 'H1:IMC-WFS_A_I_YAW_OUT_DQ', 'H1:IMC-WFS_A_Q_YAW_OUT_DQ', ...
            'H1:PSL-ISS_AOM_DRIVER_MON_OUT_DQ', 'H1:PSL-ISS_PDA_REL_OUT_DQ', 'H1:PSL-ISS_PDB_REL_OUT_DQ', ...
            'H1:PSL-ISS_SECONDLOOP_RIN_INNER_OUT_DQ', 'H1:PSL-ISS_SECONDLOOP_RIN_OUTER_OUT_DQ', ...
            'H1:PSL-PMC_HV_MON_OUT_DQ', 'H1:IMC-IM4_TRANS_SUM_OUT_DQ', ...
            'H1:PEM-CS_ACC_PSL_TABLE1_X_DQ', 'H1:PEM-CS_ACC_PSL_TABLE1_Y_DQ', 'H1:PEM-CS_ACC_PSL_TABLE1_Z_DQ', ...
            'H1:PEM-CS_ACC_PSL_PERISCOPE_X_DQ'};

The code take into account the cross-coherences between channels and produce the total coherence and an estimate of the noise projection, base on that coherence. The last figure (10) shows this coherence and the projection into the DCPD signal. A lot of noise can be explained by the coherences.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - 16:10, Thursday 06 October 2016 (30277)

Just a quick note:  Since I was running a2l many times during last night's lock, there isn't a lot of time that the lines aren't there.  The 10 min that Gabriele chose include the lines.  This doesn't change any conclusions except the peaks right around 20Hz. 

Anyhow, Gabriele is going to take a quick look at the next lock, after I left for the night just in case.

gabriele.vajente@LIGO.ORG - 16:41, Thursday 06 October 2016 (30283)

Analysis results for the next lock are available here:

https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~gabriele.vajente/bruco_1159781417/

No much difference, except that now DHARD_PIT is more relevant, see plot.

Images attached to this comment
Displaying report 1-1 of 1.