Reports until 12:17, Wednesday 26 October 2016
H1 CAL
aaron.viets@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:17, Wednesday 26 October 2016 - last comment - 08:30, Friday 28 October 2016(30888)
Calibration Factor Comparison between GDS pipeline and SLM tool
Below are plots comparing the kappas and cavity pole from LHO as computed in the GDS pipeline and the SLM tool. The data is from the end of a lock stretch, starting on October 24, 2016, at GPS time 1161341820, and lasting 4.5 hours. The agreement is very good for the most part, with the following exceptions:

1) kappa_c as computed by GDS is slightly larger than that computed by SLM.

2) The cavity pole as computed by GDS is smaller by about 2-3% (~10 Hz).

Below is a table of mean and standard deviation values for the data taken from GDS, SLM, and the ratio GDS / SLM:

                                   SLM mean         SLM std          GDS mean          GDS std             ratio mean            ratio std

Re(kappa_tst)             0.8920              0.0068            0.8915                0.0058              0.9995                  0.0044

Im(kappa_tst)             -0.0158             0.0039            -0.0145               0.0014              0.9725                   1.0764

Re(kappa_pu)             0.8961              0.0080            0.8956                0.0059              0.9995                  0.0067

Im(kappa_pu)             -0.0050            0.0056            -0.0034              0.0022               0.1662                  28.8601

kappa_c                      1.1115                0.0094            1.1168                 0.0087               1.0048                  0.0078

f_c                               354.2332         2.9296            345.0556           2.3106               0.9742                   0.0104
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
aaron.viets@LIGO.ORG - 08:30, Friday 28 October 2016 (30957)
Below is an updated table of mean and standard deviation values for the data taken from GDS, SLM, and the ratio GDS / SLM with imaginary parts rescaled by adding 1.0 (~the magnitude of the kappas):

                                   SLM mean         SLM std          GDS mean          GDS std             ratio mean            ratio std

Re(kappa_tst)             0.8920              0.0068            0.8915                0.0058              0.9995                  0.0044

Im(kappa_tst)             -0.0158             0.0039            -0.0145               0.0014              1.0014                   0.0042

Re(kappa_pu)             0.8961              0.0080            0.8956                0.0059              0.9995                  0.0067

Im(kappa_pu)             -0.0050            0.0056            -0.0034              0.0022               1.0017                   0.0061

kappa_c                      1.1115                0.0094            1.1168                 0.0087               1.0048                  0.0078

f_c                               354.2332         2.9296            345.0556           2.3106               0.9742                   0.0104


Here are covariance matrices and correlation coefficient matrices between SLM and GDS:

       Covariance                          Correlation

Re(kappa_tst)
1.0e-04 *
    0.4618    0.3208                  1.0000    0.8163
    0.3208    0.3345                 0.8163    1.0000

Im(kappa_tst)
1.0e-04 *
    0.1507    0.0012                   1.0000    0.0211
    0.0012    0.0210                   0.0211    1.0000

Re(kappa_pu)
1.0e-04 *
    0.6385    0.3128                 1.0000    0.6636
    0.3128    0.3480                 0.6636    1.0000

Im(kappa_pu)
1.0e-04 *
    0.3140    -0.0036               1.0000   -0.0293
   -0.0036    0.0495               -0.0293    1.0000

kappa_c
1.0e-04 *
    0.8895    0.4464               1.0000    0.5464
    0.4464    0.7502               0.5464    1.0000

f_c
    8.5828   -0.0252              1.0000   -0.0037
   -0.0252    5.3387              -0.0037    1.0000

Updated plots are attached as well.
Non-image files attached to this comment