Reports until 07:54, Saturday 03 December 2016
H1 General
nutsinee.kijbunchoo@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:54, Saturday 03 December 2016 - last comment - 11:55, Saturday 03 December 2016(32144)
Ops Owl Shift Summary

TITLE: 12/03 Owl Shift: 08:00-16:00 UTC (00:00-08:00 PST), all times posted in UTC

STATE of H1: Observing at 69.8653Mpc

INCOMING OPERATOR: Patrick

SHIFT SUMMARY: Lockloss as I tried to switch the ISI config to prepare for a "big" earthquake as reported by Terramon (6.0M in Alaska). Turned out Terramon predicted R-wave amplitude wrong by a factor of 7 and this ISI config change didn't have to be done. Most of the struggles were due to sudden drop of AS90/POP90 after DRMI ASC was engaged (it wasn't obvious to me at the time since the drop happened further down the path, mostly at DRMI_LOCKED). As I started an initial alignment I went through Jenne's troublehoot document that reminds me I should have looked at the error signals. After the initial alignment was done I went back to locking DRMI and zeroed the SRC1 and SRC2 error signals by moving SRM and SR2. I had to walk both SRM and SR2 to zero the error signal. The rest of the locking sequence went fine. 500-510Hz violin modes came back high and saturated the OMC DC PD so I sat at DC_READOUT and wait until the modes are somewhat damped. All the ISI ST2 configs are still BLEND_250_SC_A as Ed had them.

Comments related to this report
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - 11:55, Saturday 03 December 2016 (32147)OpsInfo

Operators should follow Sheila's directions for earthquakes, which are to not change the SEI_CONF state until after lockloss. Then, only change to the LARGE_EQ state if the earthquake is in the several micron RMS range.Terramon gives peak velocity, which explains some of the difference between Terramon and the wall FOM. We don't have good numbers on what the current WINDY configuration can ride out and we don't have a good configuration for the current high microseism.