Reports until 17:34, Wednesday 24 May 2017
H1 TCS
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:34, Wednesday 24 May 2017 - last comment - 11:17, Thursday 25 May 2017(36398)
ITMX Hartman beam back to good alignment, ready for measurement

Aidan (remotely), Nutsinee, TJ (in spirit), Kiwamu,

The return beam of the Hartman system for ITMX (HWSX, alog 36332) was successfully found on the HWS table today after people performed the full initial alignment process once.

We then centered the HWSX return beam to the Hartman camera. We are ready to repeat the measurement of the hot spot (34853).


(some details)

We followed the procedure written in T1700101-v2.

Nutsinee and I went to the HWS table after the initial alignment had been done. First of all, looking at the Hartman beam with respect to the two irises on the table, we confirmed that the Hartman beam had stayed in a good shape. We then started checking the periscope mirrors to look for the green light down from the X arm. We immediately found the green light on the top periscope mirror. Carefully inspecting the spot position on the mirror, we determined that the beam was well centered with a precision of about 5mm or so.

We steered the top and bottom periscope mirrors to make the green light centered on both irises. Finally, we steered the steering mirror in front of the Hartman camera while watching the stream live image of the camera. We found the Hartman return beam on the stream image right away. We then touched the top periscope mirror and the steering mirror to fine-tune the beam/aperture locations.

The attached are the images after we finished aligning the return beam to the camera with and without the Hartman plate.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
nutsinee.kijbunchoo@LIGO.ORG - 18:02, Wednesday 24 May 2017 (36399)

I later went back and put the HWSY plate back on. I attached pictures of HWSY with plate on and off.
The codes are running for both HWSX and HWSY and the reference centroids have been reinitialized.

Images attached to this comment
aidan.brooks@LIGO.ORG - 18:51, Wednesday 24 May 2017 (36400)

My analysis is that the HWSX alignment is off center by 20 to 40 mm. The EQ stops appear too high in the image compared to previous alignments (for reference 100 pixels corresponds to about 21mm on the optic). I would exercise caution when analyzing the results from this alignment.

Some previous alignments can be seen here:

https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=34813

 

https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=28880

 

Images attached to this comment
nutsinee.kijbunchoo@LIGO.ORG - 11:17, Thursday 25 May 2017 (36419)

Kiwamu, Nutsinee

I attached HWSX screenshots after the adjustment (with HWS plate off and on). I also fixed the weird-looking HWSY image with HWS plate on. The rtd temperature sensor snapped and made room for the HWS plate to move slightly out of place. There's also a small dent where the temperature sensor was (forgot to take a picture), no damage to the hole-ly part and I screwed down the metal plates quite tightly to make sure the whole thing laid flat.

Images attached to this comment