Displaying report 1-1 of 1.
Reports until 21:51, Wednesday 06 September 2017
H1 AOS (ISC)
hang.yu@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:51, Wednesday 06 September 2017 - last comment - 07:54, Thursday 07 September 2017(38542)
AS72 preliminary tests

Daniel, Keita, Sheila, Thomas, Hang

1,

Because the 118.3MHz and 9.1MHz&45.5MHz SBs' phase are not sync'ed perfectly, we need to use a double demodulation scheme to sense the AS72 signal, see T1700324. Previously, we offset the first demodulation frequency by 205Hz (demod at 72.8M + 205 Hz for the first demod). However, with this config we could not engage the PLL loop to stabalize the secondary demod freq.

Daniel pointed out the if we domod at 72.8M + 205, we would down convert both <45.5M, 118.3M> and <2x45.5M, 2x9.1M> to 205Hz, and the two signals could beat against each other since 118.3M SB's phase drifted relative to 9.1M. Therefore the PLL loop could not be locked. 

To solve it, we instead demod'ed at exactly 72.8M for the first demod loop, but offset the 118.3M by 205Hz. After this modification we could have a stable PLL loop to derive the 72.8M Hz signal. 

 

2,

We preformed some preliminary AS72 vs AS36 comparison. Under DRMI config (10 W input),the SRM pitch respose in cnt/rtHz were (also the first plot)

DRMI [cnt/rtHz]
  A_I A_Q B_I B_Q
AS36 253 207 944 360
AS72 2.5 0.19 1.4 1.2

In order to see the signal, we had to have a very narrow bw of 0.01Hz. For reference, the noise level for AS72 is about ~0.1 cnt/rtHz.

Then in the NLN w/ full IFO, we did the measurement again (second plot)

Full IFO [cnt/rtHz]
  A_I A_Q B_I B_Q
AS36 318 77 786 223
AS72 1.6 0.39 1.1 0.7

The noise level for AS72 is still about 0.1 cnt/rtHz.

In addition we report the sum signal under the full IFO

Full IFO SUM [cnt]
  A_I A_Q B_I B_Q
AS36 25 000 -4 300 33 000 -14 000
AS72 169 -3.3 211 -1.8

 

We also tried to see the BS repose but could not see anything even if the line we drove dominated the BS rms motion...

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - 07:54, Thursday 07 September 2017 (38547)

Note that the 72 MHz signals is tiny because the modulation index for the 118 MHz is puny. See alog 37042. Since we are adding the new modulation to the EOM for the IMC, it is completely off-resonance. Obviously, we would need a dedicated EOM, if this installation should become permanent.

Displaying report 1-1 of 1.