J. Kissel

I've run detailed analysis on the post-vent transfer functions for all HSTSs -- MC1, MC2, MC3, PR2, PRM, SR2, SRM -- taken in LHO aLOGs 39975 and 39993.

All suspensions are free of rubbing at a corner volume vacuum level of ~1e-6 Torr.

A few oddballs in the results are due to measurement error:
 - The gains on the P and Y TEST bank (through which excitation is driven) of PRM were not set to unity, so the P to P and Y to Y transfer functions look like they have higher response than previous measurements, but the scale difference is exactly the extra TEST gain. 
 - SRM transfer functions were taken with the HAM5 ISI in DAMPED only, not ISOLATED, so the second zero in the T to T transfer function shows a cross coupled mode of the ISI.
Both are non-issues.

Note, I've made a pretty major overhaul to the comparison script
    /ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HSTS/Common/MatlabTools/plotallhsts_tfs_M1.m
namely, I've rearranged the measurement list to be alphabetical by IFO, then by optic. This has a few benefits: 
    (1) The optics that we aren't measuring regularly, the LIGO India Optics are at the top. Since they don't get any new measurements ever added, we don't have to increment the measurement counter. We had to before, because they were interspersed between the other IFOs.
    (2) LLO gets to be at the bottom, so they don't have to increment LHO's measurement numbers when they add a new SUS measurement
    (3) The list is grouped by IFO, so once you add your IFOs new suspensions, it'll be more obvious if the other IFO's numbers have gotten screwed up.
This is a step toward some future better way of handling this gigantic list of data. We'll get there one day!
The changes have been committed to the SusSVN repo.