After hearing that both the TMS and PCAL beam alignments did not recover after we swapped the ETMY and aligned it to the OPLEV, I did some brainstorming with Daniel, Sheila, and Keita who were in the CR.  A few trends of OPLEV data later, and I'm thinking that Travis and I have aligned the ETMY to the incorrect OPLEV beam.  

There are 4 red beams heading towards the ETMY OPLEV receiver, of which Travis and I convinced ourselves that we understood the second from the bottom to be the main reflection beam based on the wedge orientation (it's also the brightest, which maybe doesn't matter based on the coating).  Even if this is the correct OPLEV beam, it is not obvious that this was the beam that was used for the "before" alignment of the ETM.  However, a quick look at the trend attached shows that the SUM of the OPLEV was much lower than it is now prior to the test mass swap, maybe arguing that we've got the wrong beam.

Tomorrow we will point one of the other 2 possible beams onto the OPLEV and see if the PCAL and TMS pointing are restored.