Displaying report 1-1 of 1.
Reports until 23:16, Monday 10 September 2018
H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 23:16, Monday 10 September 2018 (43926)
locking this afternoon, quick check of yaw actuator balancing

Locking with higher recycling gain:

Hang Georgia and I spent some time on the steps in the guardian in CARM_5_picometers, similar to what we did a few weeks ago after an increase in recycling gain (43787).  We mainly adjusted the CARM offsets at which things happen: The step where we digitally increase the CARM gain (LSC-REFLBIAS) and engage the boost is at 65% of the ARM cavity build up, which now means a TR_CARM offset of -48, while the transition to the REFL9 happens at 85% of the arm cavity build up as before (now TR_CARM offset = -54).  This has made the build ups more stable during these last steps of the transition and we have succeeded both times we have tried since making the changes.   The TR_REFL 9 input matrix element is now 2, where it used to be 3.

In DRMI on POP, Hang adjusted teh DRMI gains by changing the input matrix.  The MICH ugf is around 9 Hz (as it has been) SRCL is around 40 Hz (it was 60 Hz earlier today), and PRCL is around 50 Hz (was around 30 Hz earlier today).   

In the last few locking attempts we have locked with the ASC error signals close enough to zero that we could engage the ASC loops without any problems, although I know that was not true earlier in the day.  I'm not sure if people reset alignment references.  

HARD Y loops:

In alog 27832 Jenne shows some measurement of HARD yaw loops that do not have the non minimum phase feature that has been bothering us.  

Hang and I re-ran Gabriele's template for measuing CHARD Y, and see that the spot centering efforts haven't changed that feature much.  We also saw that DHARD Y is fairly cross coupled to the CHARD, you can see that our CHARD excitation shows up in the DHARD error signal about a factor of 3 smaller than in the CHARD error signal. 

I sent a line at 8.1 Hz to both ITMs, and adjusted the output matrix to minimize the signal in DHARD Y, I found that I needed a gain of 1.07 in ITMX (with 1 for ITMY) to balance them.  I tried the same for the ETMs, but they were closer to balanced.  I changed the output matrix element for CHARD and DHARD Y to ITMX to see if this would have any impact on the transfer function or the cross coupling to DHARD, but it didn't have much of an impact. 

Leaving IFO locked

I am leaving the IFO locked at DC readout with 2 W input power, a2L is running.  I used the guardian to engage violin mode damping, it is damping 7 modes on each test mass, and they all seem to be fine. 

 

Images attached to this report
Displaying report 1-1 of 1.