Reports until 12:29, Tuesday 11 September 2018
H1 PSL (IOO, PSL)
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:29, Tuesday 11 September 2018 - last comment - 09:38, Wednesday 12 September 2018(43935)
PSL work today:

At 19:10TUC,  I'd restored the ISS and FSS to locking.  At 19:22UTC, unlocked, Mark and Keita are out making measurements.

Comments related to this report
jason.oberling@LIGO.ORG - 09:38, Wednesday 12 September 2018 (43963)

On 9/3/18, P. King tweaked the mode matching into the 70W amplifier.  As Cheryl says, yesterday I took a beam propagation measurement for mode matching into the PMC.  To give an idea what the beam now looks like, I've attached a picture of the beam profile taken ~695mm from the 70W amplifier.

As there is a power drop somewhere between the 70W amplifier and the PMC, we did a quick a power budget using the water-cooled power meter; all measurements were done with the ISS OFF:

  • Before ISS AOM: 72.7W
  • After ISS AOM: 69.3W
  • After mirror M06: 69.2W
  • Before PMC: 69.3W
  • PMC Trans: 50.9W

The largest power loss is at the ISS AOM, where we lose 3.4W.  We had suspected clipping at this AOM, and it looks like that is the case.  We will have to re-think our PMC mode matching scheme to get the beam smaller at the ISS AOM.

With the 70W beam looking better, I wanted to get an idea of where we are now in regards to PMC mode matching.  Without changing the mode matching scheme for the PMC, I took a quick measurement of the PMC visibility using the locked and unlocked voltage from the PMC locking PD.  This was also done with the ISS OFF:

  • Unlocked: -0.151V
  • Locked: -0.026V
  • Visibility: 82.8%

Simply by cleaning up the 70W beam (via Peter's 70W amp mode matching tweak), we are at >80% visibility.  This is, however, somewhat disconcerting.  Looking at the above power budget, we are only transmitting ~73% of the power incident on the PMC, so something isn't quite adding up here.  Something to think about before next Tuesday.

Images attached to this comment