Displaying report 1-1 of 1.
Reports until 11:59, Wednesday 03 October 2018
H1 ISC
gabriele.vajente@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:59, Wednesday 03 October 2018 - last comment - 00:09, Thursday 04 October 2018(44318)
Longitudinal loops in PRMI/DRMI

[Jenne, Gabriele]

Trying to understand why locking PRMI and DRMI takes much longer, we looked at a few things:

Then we moved to DRMI and found that the demodulation phases for REFL9 and REFL45 were a bit off. So we retuned them(REFL9 from -23 to -20, REFL45 from 97 to 88)

Then we measured the longitudinal loop gains (with DRMI still locked on REFL 1F), and found

At the next lock attempt, we should try to switch off the BS notches and see if this makes the lock acquisition easier. We should also improve the REFL 1F sensing matrix to get rid of those cross couplings.

 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
gabriele.vajente@LIGO.ORG - 16:59, Wednesday 03 October 2018 (44327)

Changed the DRMI REFL 1F sensing element that subtracts PRCL from SRCL from -5.508 to -1.8. This made the SRCL transfer function better.

Also, tuned back REFL45 phase to 96, since this makes the MICH transfer function less coupled to PRCL.

Then I tried adding a MICH to PRCL decoupling to get rid of the BS band stop filter issue. I could get a good transfer function by adding a gain of 4.0 in the REFL45Q to PRCL matrix element. This fixed the PRCL transfer function, but somehow has a large effect on the MICH transfer function: MICH overall gain increased by a factor 2. I don't like this, so I did not implement this element permanently.

My guess is that the real reason we see an effect on the PRCL transfer function due to the BS bandstop filters is that we are currently actuating MICH only on BS, and therefore we are inducing a large driving coupling from MICH to PRCL. We should split the MICH actuation to both BS and PRM, with the right ratio.

However, none of all this seems to have any impact at all on the DRMI lock acquisition times. And the open loop transfer functions look good in full lock, once we are locked on POP signals. So moving on...

Images attached to this comment
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 00:09, Thursday 04 October 2018 (44332)

More notes about DRMi acquisition, which has been very slow tonight and is preventing us from working on anything else. 

  • We found that the +106dB filter in SRCL was always on and engaged immediately, which should be ramped over 0.2 or 0.3 seconds. (This is the filter that had the problem described in 44267) We changed it to ramp 0.3 seconds. 
  • We've had many short DRMI locks where there is a large oscillation in SRCL. 
  • We added a state to the DRMI guardian to prepare the PRMI to DRMI transition.  This is requested at the same time as the suspension is requested to align, and it should turn back on the BS limiter and low pass.  We have manually tried lowering the PRCL gain before making the transition, but we still see a 100+ Hz oscillation in MICH when SRM swings in.
Displaying report 1-1 of 1.