[Jenne, Gabriele]
Trying to understand why locking PRMI and DRMI takes much longer, we looked at a few things:
Then we moved to DRMI and found that the demodulation phases for REFL9 and REFL45 were a bit off. So we retuned them(REFL9 from -23 to -20, REFL45 from 97 to 88)
Then we measured the longitudinal loop gains (with DRMI still locked on REFL 1F), and found
At the next lock attempt, we should try to switch off the BS notches and see if this makes the lock acquisition easier. We should also improve the REFL 1F sensing matrix to get rid of those cross couplings.
Changed the DRMI REFL 1F sensing element that subtracts PRCL from SRCL from -5.508 to -1.8. This made the SRCL transfer function better.
Also, tuned back REFL45 phase to 96, since this makes the MICH transfer function less coupled to PRCL.
Then I tried adding a MICH to PRCL decoupling to get rid of the BS band stop filter issue. I could get a good transfer function by adding a gain of 4.0 in the REFL45Q to PRCL matrix element. This fixed the PRCL transfer function, but somehow has a large effect on the MICH transfer function: MICH overall gain increased by a factor 2. I don't like this, so I did not implement this element permanently.
My guess is that the real reason we see an effect on the PRCL transfer function due to the BS bandstop filters is that we are currently actuating MICH only on BS, and therefore we are inducing a large driving coupling from MICH to PRCL. We should split the MICH actuation to both BS and PRM, with the right ratio.
However, none of all this seems to have any impact at all on the DRMI lock acquisition times. And the open loop transfer functions look good in full lock, once we are locked on POP signals. So moving on...
More notes about DRMi acquisition, which has been very slow tonight and is preventing us from working on anything else.