Displaying report 1-1 of 1.
Reports until 23:05, Saturday 27 October 2018
H1 General (DetChar, ISC, SEI)
rana.adhikari@LIGO.ORG - posted 23:05, Saturday 27 October 2018 - last comment - 10:25, Monday 29 October 2018(44862)
back to locking

Last night, the microseism went up to ~1 um/s and we had trouble locking. This continued all day today. I redid some DRMI alignment (very small adjustments) and Sheila and I switched the SEI FF state a bit, and now things are locking well. WE have gotten to low noise many times tonight.

I was curious about what counts as 'high useism'. This plot (https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~detchar/summary/day/20181027/sei/ground_blrms/) compares the BLRMS at the 2 sites. As you can see, LLO has no serious problems with ~1 um/s.

Reading many entries, there are several times in the LHO log over the past few years where people not how the locking is really poor when the useism is at 1-2 um/s. Sometimes this also includes wind.

It would be useful if someone in DetChar could crawl through the locking records over the past few years to find out how touch locking is as a function of seismicity. So that in addition to the word of mouth guidance, we also have a some kind of DHS threat level that incorporates ground, wind, etc.

Comments related to this report
brian.lantz@LIGO.ORG - 10:25, Monday 29 October 2018 (44883)

A good place to start is the study that Jim Warner did during O2

Commissioning F2F Environment and Duty Cycle G1700246

and this is also useful:

Seismic controls site differences G1700245

Displaying report 1-1 of 1.