Reports until 23:25, Wednesday 19 December 2018
H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 23:25, Wednesday 19 December 2018 - last comment - 12:38, Thursday 20 December 2018(46084)
locking notes this evening
Comments related to this report
rana.adhikari@LIGO.ORG - 02:05, Thursday 20 December 2018 (46086)

This loop uses the POP WFS as a sensor and feeds back to PR2 angle. The PRC1 ASC loop uses POP QPD as a sensor and feedsback to PRM.

as you can see, this loop has multiple unity gain crossings. Hang previously has a -3dB notch for the 3 Hz part, but I think that's only a band-aid.

Best off to either lower the gain more or to put in a good compensation for the PR2-M3 TF. There was a compensation filter in that filter bank but its not quite right and its also not turned on by default.

On one lock we turned the loop gain down by 2 and things looked stable for awhile, but then we had a 3.5 Hz instability in cHard yaw, so unclear if this is a problem.

The second attachment shows the old/new filter. It is now more unconditionally stable. Checked yaw - it seems OK.

Non-image files attached to this comment
rana.adhikari@LIGO.ORG - 03:16, Thursday 20 December 2018 (46088)

Georgia, Craig, Dan, Rana

Georgia noticed that there were ~3.5 Hz yaw oscillations in arm common mode ASC.  Using the continuously running ASC sine waves, we looked at the CHARD/soft matrix and it was nearly bad: the CSOFT sensor was seeing almost purely cHard, whereas the cHard sensor had a mixture of both.

The Matrix initially had 3 RF sensors for cHard and only Transmons for cSoft. (no blending going on for yaw, although there was some pitch blend).

WE then added the CHARD_A input matrix elements to cSoft_B and ramped it in so as to cancel the cHard contribution to the cSoft loop. This worked well and as you can see in the attachment, the CSOFT spectrum no longer shows the 23 Hz cHARD line.

Next we will do the real 4x4 inversion to clean up PRC1 and PRC2 from the other loops.

Images attached to this comment
craig.cahillane@LIGO.ORG - 07:26, Thursday 20 December 2018 (46091)
Dan, Craig

Tonight Dan has been touching ring heaters while I have been messing around measuring REFL PDs.  

At one point we went to NOMINAL_LOW_NOISE.  To get there I commented out two lines in LOWNOISE_ASC, one which lowed CHARD_Y_GAIN from 2.8 to 0.75 which caused an instability to ring up, and one which turned on CHARD_Y FM3 (a low pass) which caused a lockloss.

The noise at NLN was terrible, which is to be expected with high CHARD gain.
hang.yu@LIGO.ORG - 12:38, Thursday 20 December 2018 (46102)ISC, SUS

We measured the PR2 M3 P2P sus TF. To do so we misaligned PRM, SRM, and ITMY, and then used AS_A_DC_PIT/YAW to measure the response to PR2 PIT motion. During the process we also engaged the DC centering loops to keep the beam onto the PD, yet we turned the DC gains of the centering loops down by a factor of 100 so that they should not affect the responses around sus resonances.

The measured response is shown in the first figure. From it we can also see that the PR2 P2Y coupling is actually quite small, indicating a good coil balancing.

We also fit the P2P response (up to a DC gain ) into zpk format. The fitting result is shown in the second plot and in the last .txt file we gave the zpk representation in the foton format (s-domain). This can be used for better plant inversion.

The yaw loop seemed fine and thus we did not measure them this time.

Images attached to this comment
Non-image files attached to this comment