Displaying report 1-1 of 1.
Reports until 01:07, Thursday 27 December 2018
H1 ISC
daniel.brown@LIGO.ORG - posted 01:07, Thursday 27 December 2018 - last comment - 13:51, Thursday 27 December 2018(46170)
Stable at 28W and slightly more at 30W

Hang, Dan Brown

When powering up and thermalising the coupling of PRC2 into CHARD becomes orders of magnitude greater than CHARD back into itself which seems to be the cause of our 3Hz instabilities. At 25W we injected some lines in and looked at how the coupling changed, after it reached some steady state I took 5 minutes of data and processed it offline to compute a new input matrix for PRC2 and CHARD. I used DC5_Y to try out the new input matrix, as can be seen in the DTT window here, blue (new) is looking a lot better than red (old).

We lost lock trying to switch over the matrix, so just update the guardian with these new values. When engaging ful IFO ASC it is a lot more noisy then before, when you get to CHARD_BLEND though everything quietens down and the dither loops catch up.

Name Dec 27 2018 03:58:22 UTC Dec 27 2018 07:49:13 UTC
Value Alarm Status Alarm Severity Value Alarm Status Alarm Severity
H1:ASC-INMATRIX_Y_10_11 0 NO_ALARM NO_ALARM 0.08296 NO_ALARM NO_ALARM
H1:ASC-INMATRIX_Y_10_13 0.2 NO_ALARM NO_ALARM 0 NO_ALARM NO_ALARM
H1:ASC-INMATRIX_Y_10_15 1.3 NO_ALARM NO_ALARM -0.4889 NO_ALARM NO_ALARM
H1:ASC-INMATRIX_Y_10_9 1 NO_ALARM NO_ALARM 3.4 NO_ALARM NO_ALARM

We put the old sensing matrix values back into DC5_Y to see how they behaved as we powered up in steps, a comparison is shown here. As can be seen the new matrix is overall more noisy than the old, however at 28W PRC2 is much lower than before. At 30W we didn't reach a complete thermal steady state as it got too bad, so we still need to fine tune this more tomorrow. The hope is we can get steady at 30W and then do some TCS tuning.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
daniel.brown@LIGO.ORG - 03:02, Thursday 27 December 2018 (46173)

Here's the 28W sensing matrix. The darker the red the lower the coherence between the excitation and the measurement, cell values are "magnitude (phase in degrees)". The sensing matrix is gradually becoming degenerate as we go higher in power.

This input matrix may work:

  REFL_A_RF9_I POP_X_RF_I
PRC2 0.000 -12.996
CHARD 1.000 12.996

The offline result doesn't look that great though

Images attached to this comment
daniel.brown@LIGO.ORG - 13:35, Thursday 27 December 2018 (46176)

Overnight we stayed locked at 28W for ~11 hours or so. When I came in I started tuning some TCS and lost lock when the PRCL gain dropped too much. First plot is PRCL gain, second PRCL->SRCL, third SRCL gain (46082).

Dropping CO2Y down to 0W at 28W increased the PRC gain and RF18. REFL 9Q got much quieter but trended away from 0. I then tried decreasing CO2X from 0.6 to 0.3W. This had the inverse effect on REFL9Q and RF18, reducing both, but seemed to increased the PRC gain slightly. Not sure why REFL45 becomes so much noisier when we power up to 28W.

Images attached to this comment
daniel.brown@LIGO.ORG - 13:51, Thursday 27 December 2018 (46177)

I removed the SRM dither code from ISC_LOCK in PREP_ASC_FOR_FULL_IFO and replaced it with the CSOFT/CHARD/PRC1/PRC2 lines so they switch on automatically.

Displaying report 1-1 of 1.