Jenne Sheila
Summary:
We measured the RIN on the 9 MHz sideband 00 mode through the OMC, and see that it is about a factor of 10 higher than the RIN predicted by the RF AM monitor.
Details:
The first time I tried this measurement, we were limited by the OMC DCPD dark noise 46197. These are the steps we followed this time:
The OMC DCPD signals (and dark noise) are calibrated into RIN here taking into account the extra 18dB of whitening gain. The EOM driver channel is normally calibrated into RIN assuming that the drive level is 17dBm according to Daniel, so this is divided by 3 because we are using 27dBm out of the EOM driver here.
The measurement with the excitation on shows good agreement between the RF AM monitor and the measured amplitude noise, so these calibrations are OK. We also have OK clearance above dark noise and the intensity noise seen by the ISS. So there is some additional source of intensity noise on the 9 MHz sidebands.
I was wondering what can add the RFAM more than we measure at the driver. Here are some speculations/thoughts
PeterF suggested (in an email) that the EOM matching circuit can pick up a stray radio field. If it is an ambient radio field, is the RF RIN gets better for a higher drive level (and worse for a lower level)? If the additional noise is proportional to the drive (i.e. the radiation is coming from the driver), the RIN is independent with the drive level. How can we add such a smooth broadband noise at the EOM...?
How about optical processes?
If the IMC PDH locking has the offset (e.g., due to static offset or rms offset by the AO path), this induces FM to AM conversion. Does the number make sense?
Is the modulation frequency matched with the IMC length? This can cause the modulation frequency noise to RFAM coupling.
---------
Note: The 9MHz drivers (see S1500125 or S1500126) cannot produce 27dB output. The 9MHz drivers saturate at about 24dBm setting. Of course, the injection is telling us the plot is true.
See equivalent L1 measurement in LLO alog 42928.