Notes on the procedure/measurements:

• Step 1c: (HV values)  For ETMy it's HVMON values were low (i.e. -3).  Think I noticed this last time I did this on 12/5/18
• Step e&f:  The ETMy has a much different pitch value than a few months ago.  That's fine, but I did notice Oplev pitch was pretty high over -30.  I just went ahead and zero-ed this 
• General Prep Note:  ETMx & ETMy look different.  ETMx ESD Coil outputs all have values, on order of 50k (vs. ETMy whose similar channels are all zero).  I don't look at these screens enough, but maybe this is due to how we use the ESD on ETMx and how ETMy continues to have a bad ESD (i.e. the LR).
• For ETMx measurement (see attached), the 1st data file had errors, so I only had (4)  good measurements. 
• For ETMy measurement (see attached), the 1st & 4th data file had errors, , but als had (4) decent measurements (with L
• Long Tred Plot (see attached) note:  
  • For ETMx made stop time:  2019,02,12,23,00,0
    • Used usual Long_Trend.m script.
    • ETMx ESD Charge Eff Bias Trend showed only the Mean data point for my measurement.
    • ETMX ESD Actuatioon Strength Trend showed all the data points at 0.
  • For ETMY made stop time:  2019,02,12,23,00,0
    • Used Long_Trend_ETMY_LHO.m script.
    • ETMy ESD Charge Eff Bias Trend showed only the Mean data point for my measurement.
    • ETMY ESD Actuatioon Strength Trend showed all the data points at 0.
• Let both charge scripts run to completion.  Returned pit/yaw sliders for both optics.  Returned ETMx Cal Line amplitude to 0.55 (from 0 from measurement).

Here are the original Slider Values (which I returned to after the measurement):

ETMx:

• Pit:  102.9
• Yaw:  -123.6

ETMy:

• Pit:  188.2
• Yaw:  -124.4