TJ, TVo, Danny
| Poker mask | FLIR | HWS |
|---|---|---|
| Up | Down | Right |
| Left | Left | Down |
| Down | Up | Left |
| Right | Right |
Up |
I had a look at the data from yesterday. I had expected to see features as sharp as previously measured: 14714 (and reproduced here). The reality is a lot more thermal diffusion of the features over the time-scale of the measurement. Using a shorter time-scale turns out not to work because the SNR of the HWS isn't large enough on the scale of the measurement
There are two possible fixes to this:

Ideally, we'd compare HWS measurements after one or two minutes rather than 60 to see the poker mask.
I tried adding the poker heat load map to a compensation plate in COMSOL to see what the induced optical depth change might be like. First plot shows the steady state solution for OPD, second the heat map I applied to the surface, scaling of OPD will be way off as I just guessed intensities. In order of OPD depth you'd probably see on the HWS largest to smallest: square, circle, triangle, diamond. So looks like your fourth plot is probably correct!
I overlaid the FLIR images of the central heating iris and the poker card. Then I found the center of the heat pattern and thermal lens of the central heating and circled that heat distribution and thermal lens on the poker card images. The upper left of the thermal lens image corresponds to the upper right of the FLIR image. Coupled with the large thermal lens in the lower left of the thermal lens image, this supports the hypothesis that the HWS image is the FLIR image rotated by 90 degrees counter-clockwise.

Correction on the fifth figure attached to this log post: The FLIR orientation and the mask orientation should be switched. Attached is a png with the correct orientations.