Reports until 19:55, Monday 18 February 2019
H1 CAL
aaron.viets@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:55, Monday 18 February 2019 - last comment - 11:33, Friday 22 February 2019(46984)
New GDS filters made in pyDARM with better high-pass filters

[M. Wade, A. Viets]

I made a new GDS filters file to be installed tomorrow during maintenance.  The main change is an improvement in the high-pass filters and a reduction in latency.  The actuation filters were reduced in length from 6.0s (between 2 separate filters) to 3.5s (all one filter), which in theory should reduce the latency by 2.0s.  The following changes were made to the design of the high-pass filters:

The filters file is in calibration SVN revision 6577 at this location:
trunk/Runs/ER14/GDSFilters/H1GDS_1234630818.npz

It was made using the script
trunk/Runs/ER14/H1/Scripts/TDfilters/H1_run_td_filters_1234630818.sh

The parameters file used was from the 2019-01-18 model:
trunk/Runs/O3/H1/params/modelparams_H1_20190118.py

The suggested configuration files for running this on the production and testing DMTs are:
trunk/Runs/ER14/GDSFilters/H1GDS_1234630818.ini
trunk/Runs/ER14/GDSFilters/H1GDS_1234630818_TEST.ini

The attached plots are:
1-2) Bode plots of the filters
3) ASD spectrum comparisons showing GDS-CALIB_STRAIN and GDS-CALIB_STRAIN_CLEAN.  Data was from 2019-01-30.
4-5) Comparisons of the frequency-domain model for the control corrections to the actual effect of the filters on the data.  Data was from 2019-01-30.
6-7) Comparisons of the frequency-domain model for the residual corrections to the actual effect of the filters on the data.  Data was from 2019-01-30.
8-9) Comparisons of the frequency-domain model for the response function and GDS-CALIB_STRAIN / DARM_ERR.  Data was from 2019-01-30.  Note the significant discrepancies.  One possible contributor is the fact that the front-end may not have been using this reference model during the time this data was taken from.  It is likely there are problems with the GDS correction filters as well.
10) A plot of the latency of the pipeline when reading from shared memory on ldas-pcdev1.ligo-wa.caltech.edu for ~4 minutes of data taken earlier today.  This does not include the 1.0s length of the frames.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
aaron.viets@LIGO.ORG - 11:33, Friday 22 February 2019 (47083)

At request of the calibration group, I've added a plot of BNS range during the time this data was taken, comparing GDS-CALIB_STRAIN to GDS-CALIB_STRAIN_CLEAN.

Images attached to this comment