Pep, Lilli,

Pep has taken 4 sets of HF measurements. The data are in ^trunk/Runs/O3/H1/Measurements/FullIFOSensingTFs/ (HF0, HF1, HF2, HF3).

Adding those HF measurements into the multi-meas GPR fitting, the results are shown in the first two pdf files. (Script: ^trunk/Runs/O3/H1/Scripts/Uncertainty/process_allmeas_writeGPRHDF5_20190502_addHighFreq.py)

Note that this fitting also includes the 0502 high-freq sweep (coherence is worse). By removing the 0502 sweep, the GPR fitting results are in the third pdf. The difference can hardly be told by eye. Including the poor high-freq sweep slightly improves the fitting.

The updated uncertainty estimate is shown in the first png (cf. the previous results in the 2nd png). The high-freq systematic error improves a lot.