J. Kissel

I wanted to get one last (a third) measurement of the sensing function in the current spot positions before we make the change back to the pre-July 31st positions (see plans in LHO aLOG 51262), such that we can confirm th pattern we've seen that -- in this spot position -- the low frequency response is consistent and casual.

I've successfully completed the measurements, and the data looks good [I even added a few more data points at low frequency to better resolve the feature, since our MCMC fitting algorithm continues to be quite confused by it]. Processed results to come later, but at first glance they indeed confirm that the low frequency response is quite similar.

Data lives and has been committed here: 
2019-08-14_H1_DARM_OLGTF_LF_SS_5to1100Hz_15min.xml
2019-08-14_H1_PCALY2DARMTF_LF_SS_5t1100Hz_10min.xml
2019-08-14_H1_PCALX2DARMTF_LF_SS_5t1100Hz_10min.xml
2019-08-14_H1_OMCDCPDSUM_to_DARMIN1.xml
2019-08-14_H1_PCALX2DARMTF_BB.xml
2019-08-14_H1_PCALY2DARMTF_BB.xml