Reports until 15:06, Friday 11 October 2019
H1 SUS
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:06, Friday 11 October 2019 - last comment - 17:01, Friday 11 October 2019(52428)
All HAM6 SUS are Freely Suspended; OK for Doors
J. Kissel, R. Kumar, T. Shaffer

After debugging the SQZ green fiber one more time (see LHO aLOG 52420), we were given 30 minutes to make an assessment of all 6 suspensions in HAM6. We were able to gather all DOFs of all suspensions, and they all look as free of rubbing as one can tell from an in-air measurement. We are OK for doors. 

Eventually we will analyze the data in full and compare against previous (or maybe not, we may just wait until we have measurements of the SUS under full hard vacuum and with the SEI system is its nominal observing state).

The hardest to measure continues to be the OPOS, the suspension platform for the in-vacuum OPO system for the squeezer. I've found an in-air configuration that works well enough to assess the health, and give more details below.
For all other suspensions we were able to just open up the template, turn off the damping loops, and hit "go" getting wonderfully clean measurements (all coil drivers for each SUS in HAM6 are either forced to have only one configuration [the OPOS, OMs and ZM1], or is always left in its highest noise state [the OMC].).

% Measurement Details:
In order to gather acceptable data on the OPOS while it was in-air, on a damped ISI and locked HEPI:
    (1) Turn the purge air down, if allowed (Thanks Betsy!)
    (2) The OPOS does not have switchable coil driver states, and it's fixed in its lowest noise state (see T1700434), so the coil driver request must remain in State 2.
    (3) For all the DOFs you're *not* measuring, leave the damping loops ON. (this necessarily means you'll have less fundamental cross-coupling in multi-DOF modes, like the L and P modes)
    
Also, I've re-tuned the amplitude / frequency response of the drive excitation to have much more drive at the resonances, and less gain at low frequency, and a jacked up overall gain. Some of the templates will "saturate the DAC" according to the front-end model's CDS BIT WORD, but ASDs of the MASTER OUT channels from each OSEM DOF show that the RMS of the requested drive at all frequencies is less than (2^15 ct_pk) * (1 ct_rms / sqrt(2) ct_pk) = 23170 ct_rms, where 2^15 is the peak value allowed for the OPOS 16-bit DAC (it's likely that -- because of the poor normalization of the digital AA filters that upsample from the OPOS model rate of 16384 Hz to the native IO chassis rate of 65536 Hz -- there's a ~10% amount of gain peaking that amplified the signal at many kHz, and thus saturating the DAC at those frequencies. Blah blah blah there may be some level of non-linear effects going on but the magnitude, phase, and coherence look good enough to assess an "are the dynamics OK" answer.)

As a tease, I attached one DOF (pitch to pitch) of the OPOS to show you the kind of data quality I'm able to get after all of the above.

Those new templates live here:

/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/OPOS/H1/OPO/SAGM1/Data/
    2019-10-11_2025_H1SUSOPO_M1_WhiteNoise_L_0p02to50Hz.xml
    2019-10-11_2025_H1SUSOPO_M1_WhiteNoise_P_0p02to50Hz.xml
    2019-10-11_2025_H1SUSOPO_M1_WhiteNoise_R_0p02to50Hz.xml
    2019-10-11_2025_H1SUSOPO_M1_WhiteNoise_T_0p02to50Hz.xml
    2019-10-11_2025_H1SUSOPO_M1_WhiteNoise_V_0p02to50Hz.xml
    2019-10-11_2025_H1SUSOPO_M1_WhiteNoise_Y_0p02to50Hz.xml

The data for all other suspensions in HAM6 live in the following directories:
/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HTTS/H1/
    OM1/SAGM1/Data/
        2019-10-11_2000_H1SUSOM1_M1_WhiteNoise_L_0p02to50Hz.xml
        2019-10-11_2000_H1SUSOM1_M1_WhiteNoise_P_0p02to50Hz.xml
        2019-10-11_2000_H1SUSOM1_M1_WhiteNoise_Y_0p02to50Hz.xml

    OM2/SAGM1/Data/
        2019-10-11_2000_H1SUSOM2_M1_WhiteNoise_L_0p02to50Hz.xml
        2019-10-11_2000_H1SUSOM2_M1_WhiteNoise_P_0p02to50Hz.xml
        2019-10-11_2000_H1SUSOM2_M1_WhiteNoise_Y_0p02to50Hz.xml

    OM3/SAGM1/Data/
        2019-10-11_2000_H1SUSOM3_M1_WhiteNoise_L_0p02to50Hz.xml
        2019-10-11_2000_H1SUSOM3_M1_WhiteNoise_P_0p02to50Hz.xml
        2019-10-11_2000_H1SUSOM3_M1_WhiteNoise_Y_0p02to50Hz.xml

    ZM1/SAGM1/Data/
        2019-10-11_2000_H1SUSZM1_M1_WhiteNoise_L_0p02to50Hz.xml
        2019-10-11_2000_H1SUSZM1_M1_WhiteNoise_P_0p02to50Hz.xml
        2019-10-11_2000_H1SUSZM1_M1_WhiteNoise_Y_0p02to50Hz.xml

/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/OMCS/H1/OMC/SAGM1/Data/
    2019-10-11_2045_H1SUSOMC_M1_WhiteNoise_L_0p02to50Hz.xml
    2019-10-11_2045_H1SUSOMC_M1_WhiteNoise_P_0p02to50Hz.xml
    2019-10-11_2045_H1SUSOMC_M1_WhiteNoise_R_0p02to50Hz.xml
    2019-10-11_2045_H1SUSOMC_M1_WhiteNoise_T_0p02to50Hz.xml
    2019-10-11_2045_H1SUSOMC_M1_WhiteNoise_V_0p02to50Hz.xml
    2019-10-11_2045_H1SUSOMC_M1_WhiteNoise_Y_0p02to50Hz.xml

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - 16:11, Friday 11 October 2019 (52432)

All HAM6 HTTSs are processed, results attached. All of them look free and match the results from our last closeout in Nov 2018.

Non-image files attached to this comment
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 16:45, Friday 11 October 2019 (52434)
Here're the comparisons between the above mentioned measurement of the H1SUSOPO vs. previous measurements. As described above, the results are ratty and poorly coherent w.r.t. an in vacuum measurement, but if you blur your eyes and hope, the suspension appears free.

Attached are the usual kind of plots -- comparing the individual measurement against the model (2019-10-11_2025_H1SUSOPO_M1_ALL_TFs.pdf), and then a comparison between several measurements of this and other suspensions against model (
alloposs_2019-10-11_H1SUSOPOS_OPO_Phase3a_UnDamped_ALL_ZOOMED_TFs.pdf).

For the first attachment, all the cross degrees of freedom and OSEM basis DOF measurements are all non-sensical because we don't have enough actuation strength to characterize these in air.
The second attachment, in this case, is probably the mode useful.

BUT -- we should repeat these measurements once doors are fully on and we've got some respectable vacuum in the system to really confirm that this SUS is truly OK.

Processed by 
/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/OPOS/Common/MatlabTools/
    plotOPOS_dtttfs_M1.m 
    plotallopos_tfs.m
which have been committed to the svn.
Non-image files attached to this comment
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 17:01, Friday 11 October 2019 (52436)
I've processed the H1SUSOMC, and all looks quite well. The only issue is some poor data quality on the V to V transfer function, but I'm confident this is just noise and nothing wrong with the suspension.

Data processed by:
/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/OMCS/Common/MatlabTools/
    plotOMCS_dtttfs.m
    plotallomcs_tfs.m

Non-image files attached to this comment