Reports until 17:16, Friday 29 March 2013
H1 IOO
giacomo.ciani@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:16, Friday 29 March 2013 (5935)
Little setback in IO activities

Today we fine tuned the rotation of the HWP that rotates the polarization of the beam after the IMC. We followed these steps:

- we used an HWP at the bottom of the PSL periscope to set the polarization approximately "wrong", so to have considerable power transmitted through the unlocked IMC

- we used the HWP after IM1 to make sure that a good amount of power would go in the first forward rejected beam

- we rotated IM2 in yaw so that the first forward rejected beam would clear the FI and be transmitted all the way to (almost) IM4

- we position a power meter there

- we removed the HWP on HAM2, and rotated the HWP in the PSL so to minimize the power in the forward rejected beam. Because of the absence of the HWP in HAM2, this beam contained the "good" polarization: this way we made sure that the polarization off the PSL was as bad as possible.

- we steered IM2 back in its original position, and we placed the power meter in the main beam

- we re-inserted the HWP in HAM2 and optimized it to minimize the power in the main beam, thus rotating the polarization coming out from the IMC by 90 deg, that is what we want.

Unfortunately, during this process we had the opportunity to compare the beam out of the IMC with the re-routed IMC_REFL beam that had been setup couple of weeks ago and used since then as a more powerful reference for alignment. What we discovered is that the beams are not well aligned (more than a beam diameter at the FI). Note that:

The good news is that the situation can probably be easily recovered, without moving other components, using IM1 and IM2 to make sure that the current IMC beam is aligned, at the FI and further downstream, to the reference we have been using up to now. If the offsets turn out to be big, we may need to relieve them.