Displaying report 1-1 of 1.
Reports until 11:28, Monday 06 February 2023
H1 CAL (CAL)
hsiang-yu.huang@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:28, Monday 06 February 2023 - last comment - 13:54, Monday 06 February 2023(67194)
Model DAC-driven measurement with pyDARM

Hsiang-Yu Huang

I model this DAC-driven measurement few months ago (alog63453). Currently we replace the whitening filter with 524 kHz ADC path. (LHO:66974) and also take measurement again. (LHO:66989).
Data used are stored in (LHO:67154)

Result 

The gain of this measurment in 1 kHz is ~3.08e-6 [mA/ADC cts]

Comparison

Comparison between data,  model and the model with time delay

Time delay(TD) with model here I assumed is 1.58e-4 seconds to fit the phase trend.

Extra plots:

Both of them are produced by pyDARM. Conifiguration file here I used is the parameter updated in 25/01/2023 before new run of whitening filter transfer function charactization.   

Second picture: make a plot for the path from TIA to ADC, and compensation filter in IOP model.

Third picture: make freq. vs. magnitude plot for the path from EXC to AI before TIA. Component is digital AI, DAC and analog AI

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
hsiang-yu.huang@LIGO.ORG - 11:46, Monday 06 February 2023 (67241)

Hsiang-Yu Huang

I updated the parameters from pydarm_modelparams_PostO3_H1_20230125.ini with new run of whitening filter charactiztion in LHO:67110

Then compute the model again.

Comparison:

The attachment comparison plot is similar with prevoius one.

Images attached to this comment
hsiang-yu.huang@LIGO.ORG - 13:54, Monday 06 February 2023 (67244)

Hsiang-Yu Huang

I correct the analog and digital AA/AI filter I used in configuration file. The changes is L1aa.mat -> H1aa.mat

The attachment is updated plot. 

In high frequency region, the model get closed to the measurment.

Images attached to this comment
Displaying report 1-1 of 1.