Reports until 00:00, Monday 05 June 2023
LHO FMCS (OpsInfo, SEI)
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:00, Monday 05 June 2023 - last comment - 10:30, Monday 05 June 2023(70128)
Ops Eve Shift Summary

TITLE: 06/05 Eve Shift: 23:00-07:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 134Mpc
SHIFT SUMMARY: Busy shift following first lockloss. Discovered and worked around BS ISI stage 2 kick, waited for earthquakes to pass, and adjusted PR3 due to a slight temperature excursion in the LVEA.

Lock #1:

Lock #2:

Lock #3:

Lock #4:

Lock #5:

Lock #6: (where I finally figure out what's happening)

My impressions of this behavior are that the action of turning on the BS ISI's stage 2 high isolated damping was enough movement to cause the DRMI lock to break, but once it was already on, DRMI was able to lock just fine. Tagging SEI for follow-up. It's possible Tony saw this behavior last night too when trying to lock (from alog 70114: "There were 2 Locklosses at TRANSITION_DRMI_TO_3F").

Locks #7-10:

After ground motion calmed down, I noticed that the beatnotes (especially COMM) had been steadily getting worse along with TR{X,Y} signals. Trending the PR3 oplev, I saw that it had moved a fair amount in yaw compared to its normal fluctuation over the past few days. Since I still couldn't move past LOCKING_ALS, I decided to move PR3 in yaw (slider from 153.2 to 153.5) to bring it back closer to its position last lock acquisition, which improved TR{X,Y} and COMM beatnote. I then ran another initial alignment and looked into if there were any temperature changes that could've caused this motion. LVEA zone 1B has had an excursion this evening that appears to line up with PR3 yaw motion (trend attached, tagging OpsInfo and FMCS), which is strange to me because zone 1B is closest to the vertex, not the input arm, but it may have more of an effect than I'm realizing.

Lock #11:

Handing off to Tony.


LOG:

Start Time System Name Location Lazer_Haz Task Time End
23:30 SQZ Vicky, Guests Overpass, LExC - Tour 01:24

 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
austin.jennings@LIGO.ORG - 10:30, Monday 05 June 2023 (70141)

Added trends to relevant oplevs at the time of the incursion. From my eye, it looks like potentially PR3 Y and ITMX P had a decent amount of movement.

EDIT: Added another long term trend of the oplevs, with more zone temps. Seems like with long term trends, ITMX P seems a bit suspect still (and seems to coincide with the temperature change).

Images attached to this comment