Displaying report 1-1 of 1.
Reports until 14:01, Thursday 20 July 2023
H1 SQZ
victoriaa.xu@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:01, Thursday 20 July 2023 - last comment - 16:32, Thursday 20 July 2023(71552)
Trying various FC detunings and generated sqz levels

We looked at some filter cavity detunings and slightly varied the generated squeezing level, to see if we could at all change the noise around 70-100 Hz. It's not entirely clear what's going on, no huge obvious changes, but perhaps subtle ones. At least, even at low frequencies < 100 Hz, it seems like higher NLG is slightly better, and that moving the FC detuning to -25 Hz is not obviously worse. To start, I just tried moving FC detuning up/down 5 Hz, and rotating sqz angle to see if anything was better, see the trends of the moves here.

From the screenshot, red + cyan are from hot om2 last time on 6/28. Other traces are from the recent heating of OM2; the recent no-sqz seems to have other injections going on at the same time. There may be a slight difference between brown FDS (before moving anything), the yellow FDS (moving FC detuning from -30 Hz to -25 Hz, and slightly increasing NLG), and the dark blue FDS (less NLG, same FC - 25Hz detuning, different sqz angle apparently).

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
victoriaa.xu@LIGO.ORG - 16:32, Thursday 20 July 2023 (71564)

For now, I have left the squeezer in the "yellow" configuration from above (previously we were in "brown" configuration). Differences are 90uW OPO trans (compared to 85uW), and filter cavity detuning at -25 Hz (instead of -30 Hz). Squeeze angle is the same, 145 deg. In SDF, I've accepted the FC detuning change, and OPO temp change. I think the difference might be marginal at best, but interested how it goes when IFO is thermalized. Screenshot showing ~2 hours into lock in the black trace here, looks similar to the yellow.

Images attached to this comment
Displaying report 1-1 of 1.