Rahul, Camilla, Jonathan, Erik, Dave:
At 07:33 PST during a measurement this morning the ETMX test mass was set into motion which exceeded the user-model, SWWD and HWWD RMS trigger levels. This was very similar to the 02 Dec 2023 event which eventually led to the tripping of the ETMX HWWD.
The 02 Dec event details can be found in T2300428
Following that event, it was decided to reduce the time the SUS SWWD takes to issue a local SUS DACKILL from 20 minutes to 15 minutes. It was this change which prevented the ETMX HWWD from tripping today.
The attached time plot shows the details of today's watchdog events.
The top plot (green) is h1susetmx user-model's M0 watchdog input RMS channels, and the trigger level (black) of 25000
The second plot (blue) is h1susetmx user-model's R0 watchdog input RMS channels, and the trigger level (black) of 25000
The lower plot shows the HWWD countdown minutes (black), the SUS SWWD state (red) and the SEI SWWD state (blue)
The timeline is:
07:33 ETMX is rang up, M0 watchdog exceeds its trigger level and trips, R0 watchdog almost reaches its trigger level, but does not trip.
At this point we have a driven R0 and undriven M0, which was also the case on 02 Dec which keeps ETMX rung up above the SWWD and HWWD trigger levels
The HWWD starts its 20 minute countdown
The SWWD starts its 5/15 minute countdown
+5min: SEI SWWD starts its 5 minute countdown
+10min: SEI SWWD issues DACKILL, no change to motion
+15min: SUS SWWD issues DACKILL, R0 drive is removed which resolves the motion
HWWD stops its count down with almost 5 minutes to spare.
We have opened a workpermit to reduce the sus quad models' RO trigger level to hopefully always have M0 and R0 trip together which will prevent this is the short term. Longer term solution requires a model change to alter the DACKILL logic.
During this timeline I also cleared filter history on L2_LOCK_L (very high counts before clearing) and M0_DAMP_L (no difference after clearing) details in 74889.
The channels used for the calibration measurement injections are listed in LHO:74919.
Dave, Rahul
We lost lock this afternoon and I took this opportunity to quickly implement the R0 watchdog changes. The new thresholds are given below,
ITMX R0 chain WD rms threshold - 20k counts
ITMY R0 chain WD rms threshold - 20k counts
ETMX R0 chain WD rms threshold - 18k counts
ETMY R0 chain WD rms threshold - 18k counts
I have accepted the above changes in the SDF and posted the screenshot below.
The threshold limit for ETMs is lower than that of ITMs based on the ndscope trends for the last 30days. The safety limit for ITMs seems to be around 20k and for ETMs 18k.
A more long term safety fix will be implemented in January 2024 by making some model changes.
WP 11587 Closed.