Displaying report 1-1 of 1.
Reports until 19:42, Saturday 16 March 2024
H1 INS
gabriele.vajente@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:42, Saturday 16 March 2024 - last comment - 11:56, Tuesday 19 March 2024(76462)
OMC alignment

I tested again the OMC aligment with low frequency lines, as in 76335

It looks like there is still some modulation of the DARM line amplitude at 410.x Hz. There is also some effect on the pitch jitter line amplitude, but no effect on the yaw jitter line amplitude.

New offsets that simultaneously make the DARM calibration line maximum and the pitch jitter minimum:

  Old Diff New
A PIT -0.25 -0.07 -0.32
A YAW 0.1 0.1 0.2
B PIT -0.05 -0.05 -0.1
B YAW 0.07 -0.01 -0.03

I put those offsets in. The range dropped. So they are not good. I don't understand why. I reverted them. The range went back. A step in the other directions did not change the range much, but KAPPAC dropped.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
gabriele.vajente@LIGO.ORG - 15:51, Monday 18 March 2024 (76494)

I checked that indeed GDS-CALIB_STRAIN was worse with the alignment offsets that made the range lower

Images attached to this comment
gabriele.vajente@LIGO.ORG - 11:56, Tuesday 19 March 2024 (76520)

Disregard the previous plot, there were two glitches in the data. DARM is slightly worse, but as significantly as thought.

Images attached to this comment
Displaying report 1-1 of 1.