Reports until 17:12, Wednesday 17 April 2024
H1 SQZ (ISC, SQZ)
jennifer.wright@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:12, Wednesday 17 April 2024 - last comment - 20:43, Monday 06 May 2024(77213)
OMC Scan with SQZ beam yesterday

Naoki, Vicky, Jennie W

 

Naoki followed the directions in to set up the SQZ beam OMC scan.

We had a problem with the DC centering loops. After we switched them on they saturated the OM1 and OM2 suspensions.

We got around this by switching each of the 4 degrees of freedom on first - ie. DC3 Y, DC3 P, DC4 Y, DC4 P.

Then we engaged OMC ASC and this seemed to work ok.

When we tried to manually lock the OMC length loop we had problems as when we switched the gain of 1 on it would lose lock, even when on a TM00 mode of the expected height (0.6mA on DCPD_SUM).

Vicky got around this this using a lower gain and not engaging the BOOST filter in the servo filter bank.

Then she had to touch up the alignment in lock with OM3.

locked quiet time 1397329970 GPS 1 min:

OMC-REFL_A_LF_OUT16 = 0.0930255 mW

OMC-DCPD_SUM_OUTPUT = 0.652156 mA

 

unlocked quiet time 1397330106 GPS 1 minute:

OMC-REFL_A_LF_OUT16  = 1.04825 mW

OMC-DCPD_SUM_OUTPUT = -0.00133668 mA

 

dark measurement 1397330625 GPS 1 minute:

OMC-REFL_A_LF_OUT16  = -0.0133655 mW

OMC-DCPD_SUM_OUTPUT = -0.00133668 mA

 

I noticed after I took the dark measurement that OM1 and 2 were staurating again and need to clear history twice on OM1 to remove this.

Reverted OM1 and 2, 3 OMC sliders at 8:33 am (local time) on the 16th April.

Data is saved as REf 3, 4 and 5 in /ligo/home/jennifer.wright/Documents/OMC_scan/2024_04_16_OMC_scan.xml. Where 3 is the scan channel OMC-DCPD_SUM_OUT_DQ on the bottom right plot, 4 is the PZT excitation channel OMC-PZT2_EXC on the bottom left plot, and 5 is the monitor of the actual PZT output voltage OMC-PZT2_MON_DC_OUT_DQ on the top right plot.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jennifer.wright@LIGO.ORG - 20:43, Monday 06 May 2024 (77672)

Using Sheila's code from this entry and updating the code with the current OMC values for transmission of the mirrors:

Tio = 7670e-6 #according to T1500060 page 116 input and output mirror transmission

R_inBS = 1-7400e-6

The outout of the code gives us the following values for the cavity incident power, efficiency and finesse:

Power on refl diode when cavity is off resonance: 1.062 mW

Incident power on OMC breadboard (before QPD pickoff): 1.078 mW

Power on refl diode on resonance: 0.106 mW

Measured effiency (DCPD current/responsivity if QE=1)/ incident power on OMC breadboard: 70.5 %

assumed QE: 100 %

power in transmission (for this QE) 0.760 mW

HOM content infered: 8.748 %

Cavity transmission infered: 77.827 %

predicted efficiency () (R_inputBS * mode_matching * cavity_transmission * QE): 70.493 %

omc efficency for 00 mode (including pick off BS, cavity transmission, and QE): 77.251 %

round trip loss: 2063 (ppm)

Finesse: 362.923

 

I need to compare the HOM content measurement with that derived from the mode scan.