Vicky, Camilla
Repeated 66946 PSAMs changes with SQZ-OMC scans with a new method of dithering the PZT around the TEM02 mode and minimizing it. With this we improved the mode mismatch from 4% to 3%. It will interesting to see if these settings are still better in full lock. Plots of OMC scan attached and same plot zoomed on peaks attached.
Took OMC scans using tempalte /sqz/h1/Templates/dtt/OMC_SCANS/Sept10_2024_PSAMS_OMC_scan_coldOM2.xml Unlock OMC and H1:OMC-PZT2_OFFSET to -50 (nominal is-17) before starting scan.
ZM4/5 PSAMs | TEM00 | TEM02 |
Mismatch
(% of TEM02)
|
Notes | Ref on Plot |
5.5V/-0.8V | 0.6362 | 0.02684 | 4.048% | Starting | 0 (pink) |
4.0V/0.34V | 0.6602 | 0.02332 | 3.412% | Maximized TEM00 | 1 (blue) |
2.1V/0.2V | 0.6611 |
0.02097 |
3.074% | Minimized TEM02 | 2 (green) This is 0V on the ZM4 PZT. |
3.0V/0.85V | 0.6609 | 0.02209 | 3.234% | Minimized TEM02 | 3 (orange) |
4.0V/0.34V | N/A | N/A | N/A | Minimized TEM02 | Didn't scan, checked that we got similar results with different method of minimumizing TEM02 rather than maximizing TEM00 |
8.1V/-0.4V | 0.6422 | 0.03432 | 5.073% |
Minimized TEM02
|
4 (cyan)
Chose similar ZM4 settings to what we found was good in full lock with cold OM2 in 76986
|
2.1V/-0.1V |
0.6591 | 0.02162 | 3.176% | Minimized TEM02 | 5 (red) |
2.1V/0.2V |
0.6580 | 0.01954 | 2.884% | Back to best ref2 PSAMS values | 6 (brown) LEAVING HERE |
Over 1V and under -1V on ZM5 is bad at most ZM4 strains (tested at 4.0V ZM4). For each step we adjusted ZM4 and then fine adjusted ZM5.
Note OM2 is cold currently for this measurement (and since the vent it seems).
With the orginal PSAMs (5.5V/-0.8V) we had:
At the better PSAMS settings (2.1V/0.2V) plot attached: