Displaying report 1-1 of 1.
Reports until 22:12, Friday 25 October 2024
H1 General (CAL)
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:12, Friday 25 October 2024 (80886)
PCAL End Y End Station Measurement


TITLE: 10/26 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Corrective Maintenance
INCOMING OPERATOR:  Ryan S
SHIFT SUMMARY:

PSL is still down, PSL team will be in tomorrow to continue their work. 
I just worked on PCAL measurements for Oct.



PCAL:
Neil and I followed the instructions found on Procedure and Log T1500062 to get an End Y ES measurement done.
Beam Spots Looked great: Beam Spot

The Png files for Martel measurement , WS@TX , WS@RX , WS@ RX with Both Beams at the same time all look fine with out any transients of large spikes.

Analysis of ES data:
Anthony.sanchez@cdsws25: python3 generate_measurement_data.py --WS "PS4" --date "2024-10-25"
Reading in config file from python file in scripts
../../../Common/O4PSparams.yaml
PS4 rho, kappa, u_rel on 2024-10-25 corrected to ES temperature 299.7 K :
-4.710029781861174 -0.0002694340454223 4.653616030093759e-05
Copying the scripts into tD directory...
Connected to nds.ligo-wa.caltech.edu
martel run
reading data at start_time:  1413925750
reading data at start_time:  1413926150
reading data at start_time:  1413926530
reading data at start_time:  1413927000
reading data at start_time:  1413927400
reading data at start_time:  1413927750
reading data at start_time:  1413928050
reading data at start_time:  1413928750
reading data at start_time:  1413929200
Ratios: -0.5343062568395852 -0.5430208346109687
writing nds2 data to files
finishing writing
Background Values:
bg1 =        18.462896; Background of TX when WS is at TX
bg2 =        4.560107; Background of WS when WS is at TX
bg3 =        18.342034; Background of TX when WS is at RX
bg4 =        4.550359; Background of WS when WS is at RX
bg5 =        18.459919; Background of TX
bg6 =        -0.112689; Background of RX

The uncertainty reported below are Relative Standard Deviation in percent

Intermediate Ratios
RatioWS_TX_it      = -0.534306;
RatioWS_TX_ot      = -0.543021;
RatioWS_TX_ir      = -0.527076;
RatioWS_TX_or      = -0.534647;
RatioWS_TX_it_unc  = 0.057219;
RatioWS_TX_ot_unc  = 0.053201;
RatioWS_TX_ir_unc  = 0.057906;
RatioWS_TX_or_unc  = 0.061871;
Optical Efficiency
OE_Inner_beam                      = 0.986371;
OE_Outer_beam                      = 0.984424;
Weighted_Optical_Efficiency        = 0.985397;

OE_Inner_beam_unc                  = 0.044054;
OE_Outer_beam_unc                  = 0.045775;
Weighted_Optical_Efficiency_unc    = 0.063530;

Martel Voltage fit:
Gradient      = 1637.918309;
Intercept     = 0.377773;


 Power Imbalance = 0.983952;

Endstation Power sensors to WS ratios::
Ratio_WS_TX                        = -0.928223;
Ratio_WS_RX                        = -1.383682;

Ratio_WS_TX_unc                    = 0.045315;
Ratio_WS_RX_unc                    = 0.040949;

=============================================================
============= Values for Force Coefficients =================
=============================================================

Key Pcal Values :
GS           =      -5.135100; Gold Standard Value in (V/W)             
WS           =      -4.710030; Working Standard Value             

costheta     =      0.988362; Angle of incidence
c            =      299792458.000000; Speed of Light
             
End Station Values :
TXWS         =        -0.928223; Tx to WS Rel responsivity (V/V)
sigma_TXWS   =        0.000421; Uncertainity of Tx to WS Rel responsivity (V/V)
RXWS         =        -1.383682; Rx to WS Rel responsivity (V/V)
sigma_RXWS   =        0.000567; Uncertainity of Rx to WS Rel responsivity (V/V)

e            =        0.985397; Optical Efficiency
sigma_e      =        0.000626; Uncertainity in Optical Efficiency

Martel Voltage fit :
Martel_gradient         =        1637.918309; Martel to output channel (C/V)
Martel_intercept   =        0.377773; Intercept of fit of     Martel to output (C/V)

Power Loss Apportion :
beta          =        0.998844; Ratio between input and output (Beta)  
E_T          =        0.992098; TX Optical efficiency
sigma_E_T          =        0.000315; Uncertainity in TX Optical efficiency
E_R          =        0.993246; RX Optical Efficiency
sigma_E_R          =        0.000316; Uncertainity in RX Optical efficiency

Force Coefficients :
FC_TxPD          =        9.135057e-13; TxPD Force Coefficient
FC_RxPD          =        6.218936e-13; RxPD Force Coefficient
sigma_FC_TxPD          =        5.086596e-16; TxPD Force Coefficient
sigma_FC_RxPD          =        3.245715e-16; RxPD Force Coefficient
data written to ../../measurements/LHO_EndY/tD20241025/

EY ES Trends found here:
../../measurements/LHO_EndY/tD20241025/


PS4_PS5 Lab measurements
There was also Lab measurements to pair with this:
https://git.ligo.org/Calibration/pcal/-/tree/master/O4/lab/measurements/t20241025_183704_PS4_PS5_FB?ref_type=heads
https://git.ligo.org/Calibration/pcal/-/tree/master/O4/lab/measurements/t20241025_200318_PS4_PS5_BF?ref_type=heads

I checked out these measurements, added them to a trend to see where they fall next to our previous lab measurements , and used them to run the analysis of the ES data with the Latest PS4/PS5 measurments. 
Lab Trends ( Found Here):

PS4PS5_rho_trends
PS4PS5_background_trends.
PS4PS5_alpha_trends.

This Adventure has been brought to you by Tony S and Neil D.
 

 

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
Displaying report 1-1 of 1.