Displaying report 1-1 of 1.
Reports until 14:24, Thursday 06 February 2025
H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:24, Thursday 06 February 2025 - last comment - 15:49, Friday 07 February 2025(82670)
PR2 spot move today, general instructions for doing this out of lock

Matt Todd, Jennie Wright, Sheila Dwyer

Today we lost lock right before the commissioning window, and so we made another effort at moving the spot on PR2 out of lock, correcting some mistakes made previously. Here's an outline of steps to take:

When relocking:

Today, we did not pico on these QPDs, but we need to.  We will plan to do that Monday or Tuesday (next time we relock), and then we will need to update the offsets.

Today, I also forgot to revert the change to ISC_DRMI before we went to observing.  So, I've now edited it to turn back on the PRC1 + PRC2 loops, but someone will need to load ISC_DRMI at the next opurtunity.

Comments related to this report
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 15:49, Friday 07 February 2025 (82688)

We need to add one more step to this procedure:  pico on the POP QPDs 82683

For more context, here's a brief history of where our spot has been:

  PR3 yaw slider (urad) PR2 Y2L coeffient spot position on PR2 [mm] (on +Y side of optic)
July 2018 until July 2024, except for a few days 150 -7.4 14.9
July 2024- Feb 6 2025 100 -6.25 12.588
May 21st 2024, and Feb 6th 2024 -74 -3 6

Today, we have some extra nonstationary noise between 20-50 Hz, which we hoped would be fixed by pico'ing on the POP QPDs but it hasn't been fixed, as you can see from the range and rayleigh statistic in the attachments. 

Back in May 2024, we had an unrelated squeezer problem that caused some confusion: 78033.  We were in this alignment from 5/20/24 at 19 UTC to 22:42 UTC on 5/23/24 15 UTC.  We did not see this large glitchy behavoir at this time, and there was a stretch of time when the range was 160, although there were also times when the range was lower.

Images attached to this comment
Displaying report 1-1 of 1.