Reports until 09:41, Wednesday 23 April 2025
H1 TCS
matthewrichard.todd@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:41, Wednesday 23 April 2025 - last comment - 09:41, Wednesday 23 April 2025(84069)
Using HOM spacing to estimate surface defocus from self heating and ring heater power

M. Todd, C. Compton, S. Dwyer


This is a continuation of the last alog discussing how we can estimate thermal actuator contributions to the surface curvature to the test masses. In this I tried to layout the problem with a little more detail.


Essentially, with a few different ring heater powers and their corresponding HOM spacing measurements from OMC data, we can estimate the coupling factor of ring heater power to test mass surface defocus [D/W]. The assumption is that the cavity g-factor is linear with this ring-heater power dependence, and higher order terms are assumed to be small enough to ignore.

This fit to a premlinary dataset (one HOM data point per ring-heater power_) yields a ring-heater coupling value of 0.6483 uD/W -- note: the HOM spacing has been observed to change during the same ring heater powers over time, and these should be included in the dataset.

This value is about 65% of what we think it to be, from TCS - SIM.


We can also constrain the HOM spacing shift from self-heating alone using the intercept of this curve -- this is estimated to be about 153 Hz (from 5166Hz to 5319Hz), compared to the predicted 411Hz change.

The plots and derivations are attached in the notes pdf

Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
matthewrichard.todd@LIGO.ORG - 09:05, Wednesday 23 April 2025 (84080)

For posterities sake, I'm adding links to the values of the parameters that we assume.

 

ITMY cold RoC : galaxy (line 96) and dcc (page 7), there is a ~1m discrepancy, but probably not a huge deal

ETMY cold RoC: galaxy (line 50) and dcc (page 5)

Arm Length:  dcc