Displaying report 1-1 of 1.
Reports until 12:50, Tuesday 06 May 2025
H1 General (DetChar, PEM, SEI)
debasmita.nandi@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:50, Tuesday 06 May 2025 (84283)
Effect of microseismic ground motion on DARM sensitivity

Debasmita, Preeti, Gaby

Robert did some injections at 0.2 Hz in the BS HEPI which showed a slight increase in DARM. We wanted to check further if the microseismic ground motion (0.1-1.0 Hz) is creating any noise in LHO as it does in LLO. For this, we chose the glitches in DARM picked up by omicron, having frequency in the range 10-60 Hz and SNR in the range 5-20.

  glitch rate vs ground motion in 0.1-0.3 Hz glitch rate vs ground motion in 0.3-1.0 Hz
Pearson correlation coefficient 0.605 0.472
Spearman correlation coefficient

0.602

0.439

The attached pdf shows qscans of some of the glitches chosen from high microseismic days. It is not very clear from the qscans if the glitches have arch like morphology, which is usually the case for glitches caused by scattered light. But, some of the glitches do show repetition within short time interval which make us suspect if they are produced by scattered light. We are still working on this to figure out if it is the process of scattering which is upconverting the low frequency ground motion to create noise in the 10-60 Hz band.

In summary, it looks like the microseismic ground motion is affecting the DARM sensitivity at LHO, maybe not as much as it does at LLO.

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
Displaying report 1-1 of 1.