A partial continuation of showing the characterization of the OSEM noise before versus after the satellite amplifier swaps. Today, PR2, MC2, TMSX, and ETMX M0 R0 L1 were swapped out (85770), but here I am only showing the comparison plots for PR2 and MC2. I will have to wait until we have a longer period of being in DOWN before I can get good comparisons for TMSX and ETMX because there has not been very much time after the swaps where we weren't locking or where the seismic environment wasn't set to maintenance, which results in a ton of extra noise that isn't able to be properly regressed out.

Here are the previous comparisons: 85485, 85699

PR2
Results
/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HSTS/H1/PR2/SAGM1/Results/allDampRegressCompare_H1SUSPR2_M1_NoiseComparison_1435154988vs1436654703-1200.pdf
r12453
Data
/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HSTS/H1/PR2/SAGM1/Data/dampRegress_H1SUSPR2_M1_1435154988_1200.mat
/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HSTS/H1/PR2/SAGM1/Data/dampRegress_H1SUSPR2_M1_1436654703_1200.mat
r12453

MC2
Results
/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HSTS/H1/MC2/SAGM1/Results/allDampRegressCompare_H1SUSMC2_M1_NoiseComparison_1436631330vs1436638358-1200.pdf
r12454
Data
/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HSTS/H1/MC2/SAGM1/Data/dampRegress_H1SUSMC2_M1_1436631330_1200.mat
/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HSTS/H1/MC2/SAGM1/Data/dampRegress_H1SUSMC2_M1_1436638358_1200.mat
r12454